Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Remote Cochlear Implant Assessments: Validity and Stability in Self-Administered Smartphone-Based Testing
Jan-Willem A Wasmann1, Wendy J Huinck1,2, Cris P Lanting1,2
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
The stability of remote testing in cochlear implant care was studied by testing the influence of time-of-day, listener fatigue, and motivation on the outcomes of the aided threshold test (ATT) and digit triplets test (DTT) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients using self-tests at-home on a smartphone or tablet.
Design:
A single-center repeated measures cohort study design (n = 50 adult CI recipients). The ATT and DTT were tested at-home ten times, with nine of these sessions planned within a period of eight days. Outcomes were modeled as a function of time-of-day, momentary motivation, listeners' task-related fatigue, and chronotype (i.e., someone's preference for morning or evening due to the sleep-wake cycle) using linear mixed models. Additional factors included aided monosyllabic word recognition in quiet, daily-life fatigue, age, and CI experience.
Results:
Out of 500 planned measurements, 407 ATTs and 476 DTTs were completed. The ATT determined thresholds and impedances were stable across sessions. The factors in the DTT model explained 75% of the total variance. Forty-nine percent of the total variance was explained by individual differences in the participants' DTT performance. For each 10% increase in word recognition in quiet, the DTT speech reception threshold improved by an average of 1.6 dB. DTT speech reception threshold improved, on average by 0.1 dB per repeated session and correlated with the number of successful DTTs per participant. There was no significant time-of-day effect on auditory performance in at-home administered tests.
Conclusions:
This study is one of the first to report on the validity and stability of remote assessments in CI recipients and reveals relevant factors. CI recipients can be self-tested at any waking hour to monitor performance via smartphone or tablet. Motivation, task-related fatigue, and chronotype did not affect the outcomes of ATT or DTT in the studied cohort. Word recognition in quiet is a good predictor for deciding whether the DTT should be included in an individual's remote test battery. At-home testing is reliable for cochlear implant recipients and offers an opportunity to provide care in a virtual hearing clinic setting.
