Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Classifying youth with bipolar disorder versus healthy youth using cerebral blood flow patterns
Nicholas J Luciw1, Anahit Grigorian1, Mikaela K Dimick1
1From Hurvitz Brain Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ont. (Luciw, Jiang, Graham, MacIntosh); the Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Luciw, Jiang, Chen, Graham, MacIntosh); the Centre for Youth Bipolar Disorder, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ont. (Grigorian, Dimick, Goldstein); the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Dimick, Goldstein); the Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ont. (Chen); the Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Chen); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Goldstein); the Sandra Black Centre for Brain Resilience & Recovery, Toronto, Ont. (MacIntosh); the Computational Radiology & Artificial Intelligence Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Norway (MacIntosh).
Background:
Clinical neuroimaging studies often investigate group differences between patients and controls, yet multivariate imaging features may enable individual-level classification. This study aims to classify youth with bipolar disorder (BD) versus healthy youth using grey matter cerebral blood flow (CBF) data analyzed with logistic regressions.
Methods:
Using a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, we collected pseudo-continuous, arterial spin-labelling, resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) and T 1-weighted images from youth with BD and healthy controls. We used 3 logistic regression models to classify youth with BD versus controls, controlling for age and sex, using mean grey matter CBF as a single explanatory variable, quantitative CBF features based on principal component analysis (PCA) or relative (intensity-normalized) CBF features based on PCA. We also carried out a comparison analysis using rfMRI data.
Results:
The study included 46 patients with BD (mean age 17 yr, standard deviation [SD] 1 yr; 25 females) and 49 healthy controls (mean age 16 yr, SD 2 yr; 24 females). Global mean CBF and multivariate quantitative CBF offered similar classification performance that was above chance. The association between CBF images and the feature map was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.13); however, the multivariate classifier identified regions with lower CBF among patients with BD (ΔCBF = -2.94 mL/100 g/min; permutation test p = 0047). Classification performance decreased when considering rfMRI data.
Limitations:
We cannot comment on which CBF principal component is most relevant to the classification. Participants may have had various mood states, comorbidities, demographics and medication records.
Conclusion:
Brain CBF features can classify youth with BD versus healthy controls with above-chance accuracy using logistic regression. A global CBF feature may offer similar classification performance to distinct multivariate CBF features.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Bipolar Disorder
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....