Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025
Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients
Published on: December 18, 2016
Network topology in brain tumor patients with and without structural epilepsy: a prospective MEG study
Barbara Ladisich1,2,3, Stefan Rampp4,5, Eugen Trinka6,7
1Department of Neurosurgery, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Background:
It was proposed that network topology is altered in brain tumor patients. However, there is no consensus on the pattern of these changes and evidence on potential drivers is lacking.
Objectives:
We aimed to characterize neurooncological patients' network topology by analyzing glial brain tumors (GBTs) and brain metastases (BMs) with respect to the presence of structural epilepsy.
Methods:
Network topology derived from resting state magnetoencephalography was compared between (1) patients and controls, (2) GBTs and BMs, and (3) patients with (PSEs) and without structural epilepsy (PNSEs). Eligible patients were investigated from February 2019 to March 2021. We calculated whole brain (WB) connectivity in six frequency bands, network topological parameters (node degree, average shortest path length, local clustering coefficient) and performed a stratification, where differences in power were identified. For data analysis, we used Fieldtrip, Brain Connectivity MATLAB toolboxes, and in-house built scripts.
Results:
We included 41 patients (21 men), with a mean age of 60.1 years (range 23-82), of those were: GBTs (n = 23), BMs (n = 14), and other histologies (n = 4). Statistical analysis revealed a significantly decreased WB node degree in patients versus controls in every frequency range at the corrected level (p1-30Hz = 0.002, pγ = 0.002, pβ = 0.002, pα = 0.002, pθ = 0.024, and pδ = 0.002). At the descriptive level, we found a significant augmentation for WB local clustering coefficient (p1-30Hz = 0.031, pδ = 0.013) in patients compared to controls, which did not persist the false discovery rate correction. No differences regarding networks of GBTs compared to BMs were identified. However, we found a significant increase in WB local clustering coefficient (pθ = 0.048) and decrease in WB node degree (pα = 0.039) in PSEs versus PNSEs at the uncorrected level.
Conclusion:
Our data suggest that network topology is altered in brain tumor patients. Histology per se might not, however, tumor-related epilepsy seems to influence the brain's functional network. Longitudinal studies and analysis of possible confounders are required to substantiate these findings.
