Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Delayed Intramyocardial Delivery of Stem Cells after Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Murine Model
Published on: September 3, 2020
Revascularisation for Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy
Matthew E Li Kam Wa1, Saba Z Assar2, Ajay J Kirtane2,3
1Coronary Research Group, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, King's College London London, UK.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention may offer benefits similar to bypass surgery for heart failure patients with coronary artery disease, but without the surgical risks. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial provides new insights into this approach.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a primary cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves quality of life and long-term outcomes but carries significant short-term risks in patients with severely impaired left ventricular (LV) function.
- The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy remains a clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with ischemic LV dysfunction.
- To assess whether PCI can provide similar benefits to CABG without the associated surgical hazards.
- To inform clinical decision-making regarding revascularization in patients with stable CAD and HFrEF.
Main Methods:
- The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial (NCT01920048) was a randomized controlled trial.
- It compared outcomes of PCI plus OMT versus OMT alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and viable LV myocardium.
- Key endpoints included mortality, hospitalizations for heart failure, and quality of life measures.
Main Results:
- The trial results are examined in detail within this review.
- Preliminary findings suggest PCI may have a role in selected patients, but further analysis is ongoing.
- The review discusses the implications of the trial for clinical practice and future research directions.
Conclusions:
- The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial provides crucial data on the role of PCI in ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- This review proposes a potential pathway for patient selection and revascularization decisions.
- Unanswered questions regarding the long-term benefits and optimal patient profiles for PCI are explored.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Coronary artery bypass grafting appears to provide clinical benefits such as improvements in quality of life, reductions in readmissions and MI, and favourable effects on long-term mortality; however, there is a significant short-term procedural risk when left ventricular function is severely impaired, which poses a conundrum for many patients. Could percutaneous coronary intervention provide the same benefits without the hazard of surgery? There have been no randomised studies to support this practice until recently. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial (NCT01920048) assessed the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and stable coronary artery disease. This review examines the trial results in detail, suggests a pathway for investigation and revascularisation in ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and explores some of the remaining unanswered questions.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

