Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Evaluation of a Novel Laser-assisted Coronary Anastomotic Connector - the Trinity Clip - in a Porcine Off-pump Bypass Model
Published on: November 24, 2014
Balloon-assisted subintimal entry (BASE) in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions
Michaella Alexandrou1, Athanasios Rempakos1, Ahmed Al Ogaili1
1Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
The balloon-assisted subintimal entry (BASE) technique is utilized for complex chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This method shows moderate success rates with a low incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Background:
- Limited data exists on the application of the balloon-assisted subintimal entry (BASE) technique in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Understanding the utilization and outcomes of the BASE technique is crucial for complex CTO PCI strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the clinical and angiographic characteristics of CTO PCI cases using the BASE technique.
- To evaluate the outcomes associated with the BASE technique in CTO PCI.
- To compare BASE technique utilization with other antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) strategies.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 155 CTO PCIs utilizing the BASE technique across 31 centers (2016-2023).
- Comparison of baseline characteristics and outcomes between BASE technique cases and non-BASE ADR cases.
- Inclusion of angiographic complexity metrics such as J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO scores.
Main Results:
- The BASE technique was employed in 7.9% of ADR cases, predominantly in older male patients with high prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
- Lesions treated with BASE were characterized by longer occlusion length, higher J-CTO and PROGRESS-CTO scores, and more complex angiographic features.
- Technical success (71.6% vs. 75.5%), procedural success (71.6% vs. 72.8%), and MACE (1.3% vs. 4.1%) were similar between BASE and non-BASE ADR groups.
Conclusions:
- The BASE technique is applied to CTOs presenting with longer occlusions, higher complexity scores, and challenging angiographic characteristics.
- The BASE technique demonstrates moderate technical and procedural success rates.
- Utilization of the BASE technique is associated with a low rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care