Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
High-Fidelity Cleft Simulation Maintains Improvements in Performance and Confidence: A Prospective Study
Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena1, Francesca Y L Saldanha2, Georgios D Sideridis3
1Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Children's Hospital Immersive Design Systems, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Objective:
High-fidelity simulation has a growing role in plastic surgical education. This study tests the hypothesis that cleft lip repair simulation followed by structured debriefing improves performance and self-confidence and that gains are maintained.
Design:
Prospective, single-blinded interventional study with repeated measures. Trainees performed cleft lip repair on a high-fidelity simulator followed by debriefing, immediately completed a second repair, and returned 3 months later for a third session. Anonymized simulation videos were rated using the modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and the Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair competency assessment tool (UCLR). Self-assessed cleft lip knowledge/confidence and procedural self-confidence were surveyed after each simulation.
Setting:
Boston Children's Hospital, a tertiary care academic hospital in Boston, MA, USA.
Participants:
All trainees rotating through the study setting were eligible. Twenty-six participated; 21 returned for follow-up.
Results:
Significant improvements (p < 0.05) occurred between the first and second simulations for OSATS, UCLR, and procedural self-confidence. Significant improvement occurred between the second and third simulations cleft lip knowledge/confidence. Compared to the first simulation, improvements were maintained at the third simulation for all variables. Training level moderately correlated with score for UCLR for the first simulation (r = 0.55, p < 0.01), deteriorated somewhat with the second (r = 0.35, p = 0.08), and no longer corelated by the third (r = 0.02, p = 0.92).
Conclusions:
Objective performance and subjective self-assessed knowledge and confidence improve with high-fidelity simulation plus structured debriefing and improvement is maintained. Differences in procedure-specific performance seen with increasing training level are reduced with simulation, suggesting it may accelerate knowledge and skill acquisition.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Improving Translational Accuracy
Confidence Coefficient
Modeling and Similitude
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

