Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Microwave-driven Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Fast Detection of Atherosclerosis
Published on: March 22, 2016
Quantification of carotid plaque composition with a multi-contrast atherosclerosis characterization (MATCH) MRI
Mohamed Kassem1,2, Kelly P H Nies1,2, Ellen Boswijk2,3
1Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Multi-contrast atherosclerosis characterization (MATCH) offers a faster MRI method to quantify carotid plaque components like lipid-rich necrotic core and intraplaque hemorrhage. While image quality is lower than traditional methods, MATCH’s speed and co-registration are key advantages for stroke risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Radiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Carotid atherosclerotic plaques with lipid-rich necrotic cores (LRNC) and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) increase stroke risk.
- Multi-sequence MRI quantifies plaque composition but suffers from long scan times and misregistration.
- Multi-contrast atherosclerosis characterization (MATCH) is a novel technique designed to overcome these limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare plaque composition quantification between MATCH and conventional multi-sequence MRI.
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MATCH for identifying key plaque components.
Main Methods:
- 54 carotid arteries from 27 symptomatic patients were imaged using MATCH and multi-sequence MRI on a 3.0T scanner.
- Image quality, scan time, and interobserver agreement (ICC) were assessed.
- Sensitivity and specificity of MATCH for detecting plaque components were calculated against multi-sequence MRI as the reference standard.
Main Results:
- MATCH demonstrated significantly lower image quality (p<0.05) but a substantially shorter scan time (7 vs. 40 min).
- Good to excellent interobserver agreement (ICC ≥ 0.77) was found for most plaque components with MATCH, except for calcifications and fibrous tissue.
- MATCH showed high sensitivity and specificity for LRNC (≥81%, 85%) and IPH (≥89%, 91%), but lower performance for calcifications (≥71%, 32%).
Conclusions:
- MATCH effectively quantifies LRNC and IPH in carotid plaques, offering significant advantages in speed and co-registration.
- MATCH is not suitable for quantifying calcifications due to lower accuracy.
- MATCH represents a promising advancement for clinical carotid plaque assessment, despite a trade-off in image quality.
More Related Videos
09:33A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
Published on: February 7, 2015
13:45A Method to Study the Correlation Between Local Collagen Structure and Mechanical Properties of Atherosclerotic Plaque Fibrous Tissue
Published on: November 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT