Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Performance evaluation for medical alliance in China based on a novel multi-attribute group decision-making technique
1Glorious Sun School of Business & Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Medical alliance plays an important role in promoting resource sharing, optimizing the allocation of medical resources, establishing a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system featuring primary diagnosis at the grassroots level, a two-way referral system, separated treatment for acute and chronic diseases, and dynamic cooperation. Thus, comprehensive performance evaluation for medical alliance is a necessary research that involves a multi-attribute group decision-making problem.
Objective:
The aim of this paper is to develop a new multi-attribute group decision-making evaluation framework and new weight method to better efficaciously resolve the issues of evaluation for the medical alliance.
Methods:
Firstly, Archimedean copula and co-copula operational rules, called Archimedean co-copula, and the form of q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamy mean aggregation operator based on Archimedean co-copula operational rules are also developed. Secondly, an extended q-rung orthopair fuzzy extended best-worst method satisfying multiplicative consistency is developed to originate the weight information of the attributes. The new weight method can integrate the membership and non-membership of assessment information, improve constancy for group decision making and get an extremely reliable weight consequence. Finally, a novel multi-attribute group decision-making framework is presented based on the proposed q-rung orthopair fuzzy Archimedean copula and co-copula Hamy mean aggregation operator and q-rung orthopair fuzzy Euclidean best-worst method. Furthermore, the new multi-attribute group decision-making method is applied to comprehensive performance evaluation for medical alliance in Shanghai, and the effectiveness of the new method is also demonstrated.
Results:
The results show that the proposed multi-attribute group decision-making method with Archimedean copulas-based Hamy operators and extended best-worst in this paper outperforms some existing methods and provides support for policymakers seeking the use of patient- and community-centered health evaluations to improve health services.
Conclusion:
The proposed method is a theoretical guidance method and a good reference for the evaluation of medical alliances of other regions in China.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
01:21Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups