Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Ultrasonic Assessment of Myocardial Microstructure
Published on: January 14, 2014
ComBat Harmonization of Myocardial Radiomic Features Sensitive to Cardiac MRI Acquisition Parameters
Sarv Priya1, Durjoy D Dhruba1, Eldon Sorensen1
1From the Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 (S.P., S.N.); Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (D.D.D., M.J.) and Department of Biostatistics (E.S., K.D.C.), University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla (P.Y.A.); and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (P.N.).
Purpose:
To investigate the effect of ComBat harmonization methods on the robustness of cardiac MRI-derived radiomic features to variations in imaging parameters.
Materials And Methods:
This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study used a publicly available data set of 11 healthy controls (mean age, 33 years ± 16 [SD]; six men) and five patients (mean age, 52 years ± 16; four men). A single midventricular short-axis section was acquired with 3-T MRI using cine balanced steady-state free precision, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T1 mapping, and T2 mapping imaging sequences. Each sequence was acquired using baseline parameters and after variations in flip angle, spatial resolution, section thickness, and parallel imaging. Image registration was performed for all sequences at a per-individual level. Manual myocardial contouring was performed, and 1652 radiomic features per sequence were extracted using baseline and variations in imaging parameters. Radiomic feature stability to change in imaging parameters was assessed using Cohen d sensitivity. The stability of radiomic features was assessed both without and after ComBat harmonization of radiomic features. Three ComBat methods were studied: parametric, nonparametric, and Gaussian mixture model (GMM).
Results:
For all sequences combined, 51.4% of features were robust to changes in imaging parameters when no ComBat method was applied. ComBat harmonization substantially increased the number of stable features to 95.1% (95% CI: 94.9, 95.3) when parametric ComBat was used and 90.9% (95% CI: 90.6, 91.2) when nonparametric ComBat was used. GMM combat resulted in only 52.6% stable features.
Conclusion:
ComBat harmonization improved the stability of radiomic features to changes in imaging parameters across all cardiac MRI sequences.Keywords: Cardiac MRI, Radiomics, ComBat, Harmonization Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
11:09High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...