Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Torts III01:26

Torts III

699
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
699
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

147
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
147
Torts II01:13

Torts II

654
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
654
Conduct Disorder01:28

Conduct Disorder

52
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
52
Bias01:22

Bias

4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Language as an Eligibility Criterion in Pediatric Study Protocols Conducted in Europe (2007-2024) Reported in the ClinicalTrials.gov Database.

Pharmaceutical medicine·2026
Same author

Expertise of European Clinical Trial Units in Conducting and Managing Cross-Border Pediatric Clinical Trials for Rare Diseases.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2026
Same author

Disclosing the Possibility of Early Trial Termination to Prospective Clinical Trial Participants.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Use of AI as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Elements, Considerations, and Recommendations.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

More transparency needed on misconduct.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

International Ethical Principles for Banking and Secondary Research Use of Human Biospecimens and Associated Data: The Seattle Principles.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Correction.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Development, validity, and reliability of the pre-attendance conference evaluator (PACE) tool for identifying predatory conferences.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Managing manuscripts with potential dual-use research of concern: A thematic analysis of life science journal policies.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Researching retraction: Do we need more rules or more honesty?

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Accountability in evidence syntheses: On the need for rigorous peer review and reporting guidelines.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies.

Accountability in research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

71.0K

Defining "recklessness" in research misconduct proceedings.

Minal M Caron1, Sarah B Dohan1, Mark Barnes1,2

  • 1Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA, USA.

Accountability in Research
|September 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Determining research misconduct requires assessing intent, knowledge, or recklessness. This paper offers a framework to evaluate "reckless" supervisory conduct, even when senior authors did not perform experiments, aiding institutions in misconduct investigations.

Keywords:
NIH; responsible conduct of researchORIResearch misconductrecklessness

More Related Videos

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

71.0K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.5K
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Integrity
  • Research Ethics
  • Academic Misconduct

Background:

  • Institutions must prove intent, knowledge, or recklessness for research misconduct.
  • The standard of "reckless" conduct often presents challenges for institutions.
  • Supervising senior authors may face misconduct allegations despite not performing experiments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework for assessing "reckless" supervisory conduct.
  • To clarify the evaluation of senior authors in research misconduct cases.
  • To aid institutions in determining when supervision constitutes misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing standards for research misconduct.
  • Development of criteria for evaluating "reckless" behavior in supervision.
  • Case study considerations for institutional review boards.

Main Results:

  • Identified key factors distinguishing "reckless" conduct from negligence.
  • Proposed a structured approach for investigating supervisory roles.
  • Highlighted the importance of supervision standards in research integrity.

Conclusions:

  • A clear framework can help institutions consistently assess "reckless" supervision.
  • Supervisors can be found guilty of misconduct based on inadequate oversight.
  • This guidance supports fair and accurate research misconduct investigations.