Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left atrial remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Fabry disease: A CMR-based head-to-head comparison and
Alice Moroni1, Lara Tondi2, Valentina Milani3
1Clinical and Interventional Cardiology Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy; Multimodality Cardiac Imaging Section, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Insights
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) shows greater left atrial (LA) remodeling than Fabry disease cardiomyopathy (FD) with similar left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). LA reservoir strain predicts heart failure (HF) in HCM patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Genetic Medicine
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and Fabry disease cardiomyopathy (FD) present as phenocopies with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- The left atrium (LA) is increasingly recognized as a marker for disease severity in both HCM and FD.
- This study investigates LA morpho-functional parameters in HCM versus FD with comparable LVH to identify differences and clinical outcome correlates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare left atrial (LA) morpho-functional parameters between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and Fabry disease cardiomyopathy (FD) patients with similar left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- To explore the association of LA parameters with clinical outcomes in these patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT), T1 mapping, and conventional imaging were used to assess 30 HCM and 30 FD patients matched for age, sex, BSA, LV mass, and risk factors, plus 30 controls.
- Transthoracic echocardiography evaluated LV diastolic function.
- Clinical events, including atrial/ventricular events, bradyarrhythmia, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and death, were tracked during follow-up.
Main Results:
- HCM patients exhibited significantly greater LA remodeling than FD patients, characterized by higher LA end-systolic volume index (LAVi max), lower LA ejection fraction (LA-EF), and impaired reservoir (εs) and booster (εa) functions.
- LA parameters, including LAVi max, demonstrated potential in differentiating between FD and HCM.
- LAVi max independently predicted HCM diagnosis, and LA reservoir strain (εs) was associated with HF occurrence in HCM patients at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Left atrial remodeling is more pronounced in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) compared to Fabry disease cardiomyopathy (FD) even with similar left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- LA reservoir strain is a significant predictor of heart failure (HF) in HCM patients.
- These findings highlight distinct LA involvement in HCM and FD and the prognostic value of LA function in HCM.
Background:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and Fabry disease cardiomyopathy (FD) are phenocopies, as they show left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The left atrium (LA) is emerging as a potential marker of disease severity in both cardiomyopathies. The present study compares HCM and FD cardiomyopathy with similar degree of LVH, exploring LA morpho-functional parameters and the correlates of clinical outcome.
Methods:
We performed a comprehensive CMR-based comparison between 30 HCM and 30 FD patients matched on age, sex, BSA, LV mass and major cardiovascular risk factors affecting LA remodeling (arterial hypertension and diabetes). 30 healthy controls were also included. CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT) analysis, T1 mapping and conventional parameters were evaluated. Patients also underwent transthoracic echocardiography for LV diastolic function assessment. Clinical events at follow-up were collected (atrial and ventricular events, bradyarrhythmia, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and death).
Results:
HCM patients showed greater LA remodeling compared to FD patients, namely higher LA end-systolic volume index (LAVi max), lower LA-ejection fraction (LA-EF) and worse reservoir (εs) and booster function (εa) (all p < 0.05). Accordingly, these parameters have demonstrated good potential for distinguishing between FD and HCM (AUC 0.68-0.73, all p < 0.05), with LAVi max being an independent predictor for HCM diagnosis (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.011-1.132, p 0.02). Moreover, in HCM patients a significant association between εs and HF occurrence was observed at 2-year follow-up (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.72-0.99, p 0.04).
Conclusions:
In HCM, LA remodeling is greater than in FD cardiomyopathy with similar LVH, and reservoir strain is associated with HF at follow-up.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
10:39Rat Model of Right-Sided Cardiac Remodeling and Arrhythmia Using Pulmonary Artery Banding
Published on: August 30, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care