Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.9K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.9K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

12.5K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
12.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antimicrobial Mechanism of Temporin L Peptide Against Bacillus cereus from Fermented Sausage.

Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins·2026
Same author

Frequent exposure to biologics is associated with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with Crohn's disease: a retrospective case-control study.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Clinical value of repeat kidney biopsy in pediatric IgA vasculitis nephritis.

Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Processing-dependent hepatic risk and benefit of Polygonum Multiflorum Radix: Integrated chemical profiling, in vivo validation and candidate quality control markers.

Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis·2026
Same author

Intratumor <i>Lactobacillus</i> drives ferroptosis resistance via D-lactate-STAT3 K631 lactylation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Gut microbes·2026
Same author

From Molecular Recognition to On-Site Detection: A Highly Selective Strategy for Monitoring Gizzerosine in Feed by Overcoming Histamine Interference.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K

Use of tree-based machine learning methods to screen affinitive peptides based on docking data.

Hua Feng1, Fangyu Wang1, Ning Li2

  • 1Henan Key Laboratory of Animal Immunology, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.

Molecular Informatics
|September 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning, specifically the C5.0 decision tree model, effectively screens peptide drug candidates using virtual docking data. This approach enhances peptide-drug discovery by improving affinity prediction accuracy.

Keywords:
affinity classificationdocking datamachine learningpeptidestree-based algorithms

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

71
Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates
13:49

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates

Published on: December 6, 2017

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.9K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

71
Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates
13:49

Semi-automated Biopanning of Bacterial Display Libraries for Peptide Affinity Reagent Discovery and Analysis of Resulting Isolates

Published on: December 6, 2017

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Bioinformatics
  • Machine learning in drug discovery

Background:

  • Peptide-drug discovery relies on identifying high-affinity peptides.
  • Machine learning offers a powerful tool for accurate peptide affinity screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of four tree-based machine learning algorithms for predicting peptide affinity using virtual docking data.
  • To identify the optimal algorithm for accurate and robust peptide affinity prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Four tree-based algorithms (CART, C5.0, BAG, RF) were applied to virtual docking data.
  • Datasets were pre-processed using scaling, centering, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA).
  • Model performance was evaluated using metrics like Accuracy, Kappa, Sensitivity, Specificity, F1, MCC, and AUC.

Main Results:

  • The optimized C5.0 model (C50O) demonstrated superior performance across multiple metrics on test and unknown datasets (80.4% Accuracy).
  • Bagged CART (BAG) and optimized Random Forest (RFO) showed high prediction correlation with C50O, indicating stability.
  • CART (CARTO) exhibited poor performance in test data validation, limiting its predictive utility.

Conclusions:

  • The C5.0 decision tree model is highly effective for predicting peptide affinity from virtual docking data.
  • This study provides a benchmark for tree-based models in peptide-protein interaction (PPI) research.
  • The findings support the expanded application of machine learning in developing peptide therapeutics.