Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Reliability of gaze-contingent perimetry
Nikita Thomas1,2, Jennifer H Acton1, Jonathan T Erichsen1
1School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 4HQ, UK.
Continuous gaze-contingency (CGC) offers a more accurate method for visual field testing, especially for individuals with nystagmus. This new technique improves reliability and precision in measuring visual field sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Vision Science
Background:
- Standard automated perimetry is limited by eye movements, affecting reliability in patients with unstable fixation like nystagmus.
- Existing microperimetry with partial gaze-contingency (PGC) offers partial correction for eye movements.
- Accurate visual field testing is crucial for detecting and monitoring vision loss.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a novel 'continuous gaze-contingency' (CGC) method for visual field examination.
- To assess the accuracy and reliability of CGC compared to PGC and no gaze-contingency (NoGC).
- To demonstrate the utility of CGC in individuals with infantile nystagmus and healthy observers.
Main Methods:
- Developed and implemented a continuous gaze-contingency (CGC) visual field testing system.
- Compared CGC with PGC and NoGC in measuring the blind spot edges in infantile nystagmus cases.
- Evaluated stimulus positional error and test-retest variability of CGC, PGC, and NoGC in healthy participants.
Main Results:
- CGC demonstrated greater accuracy in measuring blind spot edges in infantile nystagmus compared to PGC and NoGC.
- CGC achieved the lowest stimulus positional error (± 0.29°) in healthy observers, outperforming PGC (± 0.54°) and NoGC (± 0.81°).
- CGC exhibited test-retest variability comparable to or better than PGC and NoGC.
Conclusions:
- Continuous gaze-contingency (CGC) is a reliable and precise method for visual field examination in healthy individuals.
- CGC shows promise for accurate visual field threshold estimation, even in patients with infantile nystagmus.
- This novel approach enhances the reliability of visual field testing, particularly for individuals with fixation instability.
More Related Videos
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Horizontal Curve: Problem Solving
Sight Distance in a Vertical Curve
Lines in Space