Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform
Published on: February 12, 2014
F-number optimization for synthetic aperture delay-multiply-and-sum reconstruction
Philip M Holmes1, Hyoung-Ki Lee2, Matthew W Urban2
1Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Choosing transmit and receive f-numbers significantly affects ultrasound image quality. This study systematically analyzed f-number impacts on delay-and-sum (DAS) and delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS) synthetic aperture imaging for optimized contrast and resolution.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound Technology
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Transmit and receive f-numbers influence ultrasound image contrast and spatial resolution.
- Previous research focused on receive f-number effects in delay-and-sum (DAS) plane wave imaging.
- A systematic investigation of f-numbers in DAS and delay-multiply-and-sum (DMAS) synthetic aperture (SA) imaging is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the impact of varying transmit and receive f-numbers on DAS and DMAS SA imaging.
- To quantify effects on main lobe to side lobe energy ratio (MSER), generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR), and spatial resolution.
- To provide guidance for f-number selection in SA imaging algorithms.
Main Methods:
- Measurements were performed using a wire target in a water tank and a standard imaging phantom.
- Transmit and receive f-numbers were varied from 1 to 5 in 0.2 increments.
- Key metrics including MSER, gCNR, and spatial resolution were analyzed for DAS and DMAS reconstructions.
Main Results:
- Higher MSER was achieved with mid-range transmit f-numbers (2-4) and high receive f-numbers (>4) for both DAS and DMAS.
- DAS achieved high gCNR with high transmit/receive f-numbers (>4) but reduced spatial resolution.
- DMAS achieved high gCNR with low transmit (<3) and high receive f-numbers (>4) with less spatial resolution tradeoff, though overall gCNR was lower than DAS. High spatial resolution was observed with low receive f-numbers (<2) for both methods. DMAS generally offered higher spatial resolution than DAS.
Conclusions:
- F-number selection critically impacts performance trade-offs between contrast and resolution in DAS and DMAS SA imaging.
- DMAS offers a potentially better balance between contrast and resolution compared to DAS.
- Findings can inform optimal f-number choices for specific ultrasound imaging applications using SA techniques.
More Related Videos
14:09High-Throughput Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence and Direct Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy Using a Photonic Chip
Published on: November 16, 2019
08:29Averaging of Viral Envelope Glycoprotein Spikes from Electron Cryotomography Reconstructions using Jsubtomo
Published on: October 21, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Upsampling
Aliasing
If the sampling frequency is below the Nyquist rate, these replicas overlap, preventing the original...
Reconstruction of Signal using Interpolation