Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

303
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
303
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

127
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
127
What is Evolutionary History?02:35

What is Evolutionary History?

36.6K
Scientists record evolutionary history by analyzing fossil, morphological, and genetic data. The fossil record documents the history of life on Earth and provides evidence for evolution. However, both fossil and living organisms offer evidence that outlines Earth’s evolutionary history.
36.6K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

42.9K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
42.9K
Eukaryotic Evolution01:24

Eukaryotic Evolution

35.0K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
35.0K
Trophic Levels01:35

Trophic Levels

31.0K
All organisms in an ecosystem occupy a trophic level in the food chain. The lowest level consists of primary producers, which synthesize their food from either solar or chemical energy. Each subsequent level obtains energy from the levels below. Detritivores can occupy any of the levels above primary producers.
31.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceived Waist-to-Hip Ratio Predicts Attractiveness, Age, and Parity Judgments in Pre-Contemporary European Portraits of Clothed Women.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

Moral cognition is contractualist, but does not work by simulating a bargaining process.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

'Our Roots Run Deep': Historical Myths as Culturally Evolved Technologies for Coalitional Recruitment - CORRIGENDUM.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Evolutionary parsimony: an equilibrium refinement that sharply constrains the space of outcomes in games with multiple equilibria.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Quantifying and explaining the rise of fiction.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Victims of Misfortune are Blamed for Imposing Costs on Others : Testing a Cooperation-Dilemma Factor in Victim-Blame.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2025
Same journal

The cultural ecology of social media.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

On the functional redundancy of alcohol tolerance in rice societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Comparing predictions of anger in conflict situations: Recalibrational Theory versus Dark Triad traits.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Adverse childhood experiences, age at menopause, and vasomotor symptoms among mid-life Latine adults in California.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

The evolution of identity signals for co-ordination in diverse societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

An evolutionary approach to privacy and information-management psychology.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.4K

Cultural evolution from the producers' standpoint.

Jean-Baptiste André1, Nicolas Baumard1, Pascal Boyer2

  • 1Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.

Evolutionary Human Sciences
|September 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cultural evolution models should prioritize the fitness costs and benefits for producers, not just consumers. This producer-centric view explains how cultural products, as extended phenotypes, influence cooperation, manipulation, and exploitation within social groups.

Keywords:
cultural evolutionevolutionary psychologyfitness costssocial evolution theorysymbolic culture

More Related Videos

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

14.5K
Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol
14:53

Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol

Published on: October 24, 2016

11.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

3.4K
Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat
06:03

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

14.5K
Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol
14:53

Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol

Published on: October 24, 2016

11.3K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Cultural Evolution
  • Behavioral Ecology

Background:

  • Traditional cultural evolution models focus on cultural trait recipients.
  • These models often overlook the fitness costs and benefits associated with producing cultural traits.
  • This oversight limits understanding of how cultural products emerge and spread.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a producer-centric framework for cultural evolution.
  • To integrate the fitness costs and benefits of cultural production into evolutionary models.
  • To explain specific features of cultural products from the producer's perspective.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of cultural production.
  • Analysis of fitness costs and benefits in cultural transmission.
  • Conceptual framework development focusing on extended phenotype.

Main Results:

  • Cultural products can be viewed as an extended phenotype of producers.
  • Producers incur fitness costs and gain benefits from creating cultural traits.
  • These costs and benefits influence recipient interactions like cooperation and exploitation.

Conclusions:

  • A producer-focused approach offers novel insights into cultural evolution.
  • Understanding production costs is crucial for explaining cultural diversity and spread.
  • This perspective enhances models of cooperation, manipulation, and exploitation in cultural systems.