Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Versus 4 Rods Across the Cervicothoracic Junction in a Human Cadaveric Model

Posterior reconstruction of the cervicothoracic junction poses significant biomechanical challenges secondary to transition from the mobile cervical to rigid thoracic spines and change in alignment from lordosis to kyphosis. After destabilization, the objectives of the current investigation were to compare the rod strain and multidirectional flexibility properties of the cervicothoracic junction using a 4-rod vs traditional 2-rod reconstructions.

Ten human cadaveric cervicothoracic specimens underwent multidirectional flexibility testing including flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. After intact analysis, specimens were destabilized from C4 to T3 and instrumented from C3 to T4. The following reconstructions were tested: (1) 3.5-mm titanium (Ti) 2-rod, (2) 3.5-mm Ti 4-rod, (3) 4.0-mm cobalt chrome (CoCr) 2-rod, (4) 4.0-mm CoCr 4-rod, and (5) Ti 3.5- to 5.5-mm tapered rod reconstructions. The operative level range of motion and rod strain of the primary and accessory rods were quantified.

The addition of accessory rods to a traditional 2-rod construct improved the biomechanical stability of the reconstructions in all three loading modalities for Ti ( P < .05). The accessory CoCr rods improved stability in flexion-extension and axial rotation ( P < .05). The addition of accessory rods in Ti or CoCr reconstructions did not significantly reduce rod strain ( P < .05). CoCr 2 and 4 rods exhibited less strain than both Ti 2 and 4 rods.

Supplemental accessory rods affixed to traditional 2-rod constructs significantly improved stability of Ti alloys and CoCr alloy materials. The 4.0-mm CoCr rods provided greater stability than 3.5-mm Ti rods in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. While rod strain was not significantly reduced by the addition of accessory rods, it was reduced in CoCr rod treatment groups compared with the Ti rods.