Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias01:22

Bias

4.3K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.3K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.3K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

343
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
343
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

40.6K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Spector Job Satisfaction Survey: Associations of Satisfaction with Leaving EMS.

Prehospital emergency care·2025
Same author

Rothman diagrams: the geometry of confounding and standardization.

International journal of epidemiology·2024
Same author

Pairwise Accelerated Failure Time Regression Models for Infectious Disease Transmission in Close-Contact Groups With External Sources of Infection.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

COVID-19 and coworker conflict among emergency medical service clinicians.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2024
Same author

Projecting COVID-19 Cases and Subsequent Hospital Burden in Ohio.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2022
Same author

Dynamic survival analysis for non-Markovian epidemic models.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2022
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

742

A Potential Outcomes Approach to Selection Bias.

Eben Kenah1

  • 1From the Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce a new way to define selection bias in epidemiology using potential outcomes. This framework unifies different bias types and simplifies analysis in various study designs.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

742
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.5K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Selection bias is a major challenge in analytic epidemiology, potentially distorting causal effect estimates.
  • Existing definitions and methods for addressing selection bias are often disparate and may not cover all mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel, unified definition of selection bias in analytic epidemiology.
  • To provide a nonparametric framework for analyzing selection bias using potential outcomes and single-world intervention graphs.
  • To demonstrate the adaptability of this approach to both analytic and descriptive epidemiology, and various study designs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the potential outcomes framework to define selection bias.
  • Employing single-world intervention graphs for bias analysis under and away from the null hypothesis.
  • Illustrating the approach with examples from epidemiological studies, including matched and case-cohort designs.

Main Results:

  • The proposed definition encompasses both structural and traditional concepts of selection bias.
  • The nonparametric approach allows for simultaneous analysis of confounding and selection bias.
  • The framework explicitly connects participant selection to causal effect estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The novel definition offers a unified perspective on the diverse mechanisms generating selection bias.
  • This approach simplifies the analysis of selection bias in complex epidemiological study designs.
  • The potential outcomes framework provides a robust foundation for causal inference in the presence of selection bias.