Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

144
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
144
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

52
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
52
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

192
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
192
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

147
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
147
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Spector Job Satisfaction Survey: Associations of Satisfaction with Leaving EMS.

Prehospital emergency care·2025
Same author

Pairwise Accelerated Failure Time Regression Models for Infectious Disease Transmission in Close-Contact Groups With External Sources of Infection.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

COVID-19 and coworker conflict among emergency medical service clinicians.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2024
Same author

A Potential Outcomes Approach to Selection Bias.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2023
Same author

Projecting COVID-19 Cases and Subsequent Hospital Burden in Ohio.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2022
Same author

Dynamic survival analysis for non-Markovian epidemic models.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Rothman diagrams: the geometry of confounding and standardization.

Eben Kenah1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

International Journal of Epidemiology
|November 15, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a geometric approach to causal inference in cohort studies, visualizing how standardization controls confounding. It demonstrates that confounding occurs when crude risk points fall outside the convex hull of stratum-specific risks.

Keywords:
ConfoundingL’Abbéplotsstandardization

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Causal Inference
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Confounding is a major challenge in observational studies, potentially biasing estimates of causal effects.
  • Standardization is a common method to adjust for confounding in epidemiological research.
  • Visualizing causal relationships and confounding can aid understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a geometric framework for understanding causal inference and confounding in cohort studies.
  • To illustrate the role of standardization in controlling for confounding using a visual approach.
  • To provide epidemiologists with a novel perspective on analyzing cohort data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Rothman diagrams to plot disease risks.
  • Representing crude and stratum-specific risks as points in a unit square.
  • Defining standardization as movement along line segments or within convex hulls.
  • Illustrating concepts with a real-world cohort study example.

Main Results:

  • Confounding is geometrically represented as crude risk points deviating from the line segment connecting stratum-specific risks.
  • For multiple confounder strata, confounding is indicated when crude points lie outside the convex hull of stratum-specific points.
  • The geometric approach visually clarifies the impact of confounding and the effect of standardization.

Conclusions:

  • A geometric perspective offers an intuitive way to understand confounding and standardization in causal inference.
  • This visualization method can enhance epidemiologists' comprehension of complex causal relationships.
  • The framework is applicable to various cohort study designs with binary exposures, outcomes, and confounders.