Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prone Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Ventilated Patients

Assessing the safety and efficacy of enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving prone position ventilation is essential to optimize treatment strategies for critically ill patients. Systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prone position enteral nutrition in critically ill ventilated patients, providing a reference for clinical decision-making.

We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant studies on the safety and efficacy of enteral nutrition in prone ventilation patients. Our search encompassed randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and cohort studies, utilizing databases including PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The search duration spanned from May 2000 to May 2023. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select eligible literature, followed by data extraction and quality assessment. We employed specific keywords and filters in our search strategy to ensure a robust selection of studies. Subsequently, statistical analysis was performed utilizing RevMan 5.2 software to synthesize and interpret the findings effectively.

Five articles were ultimately included, with a total of 372 patients undergoing prone ventilation. The meta-analysis results showed that patients receiving enteral nutrition during prone and supine ventilation had higher levels of gastric residue incidence [RR = -0.01, 95% CI: (-0.08, 0.06), P = .77]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of vomiting/reflux between the prone position group and the control group [RR = 0.60, 95%CI: (0.15-2.45), P = .48]. Prone position ventilation had no significant effect on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [RR = 1.00, 95%CI: (0.14-6.90), P = 1.00]. There was no significant difference in the rate of enteral nutrition interruption between the prone position group and the control group [RR = 0.65, 95%CI: (0.28-1.52), P = .32].

Enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving prone position ventilation was not associated with high levels of gastric residual, vomiting or reflux, ventilator-associated pneumonia, or increased incidence of enteral nutrition interruption.