Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
Thresholding Gini variable importance with a single-trained random forest: An empirical Bayes approach
Robert Dunne1, Roc Reguant2, Priya Ramarao-Milne2
1Data61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract:
Random forests (RFs) are a widely used modelling tool capable of feature selection via a variable importance measure (VIM), however, a threshold is needed to control for false positives. In the absence of a good understanding of the characteristics of VIMs, many current approaches attempt to select features associated to the response by training multiple RFs to generate statistical power via a permutation null, by employing recursive feature elimination, or through a combination of both. However, for high-dimensional datasets these approaches become computationally infeasible. In this paper, we present RFlocalfdr, a statistical approach, built on the empirical Bayes argument of Efron, for thresholding mean decrease in impurity (MDI) importances. It identifies features significantly associated with the response while controlling the false positive rate. Using synthetic data and real-world data in health, we demonstrate that RFlocalfdr has equivalent accuracy to currently published approaches, while being orders of magnitude faster. We show that RFlocalfdr can successfully threshold a dataset of 106 datapoints, establishing its usability for large-scale datasets, like genomics. Furthermore, RFlocalfdr is compatible with any RF implementation that returns a VIM and counts, making it a versatile feature selection tool that reduces false discoveries.
Related Concept Videos
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

