Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Basic Methods for the Study of Reproductive Ecology of Fish in Aquaria
Published on: July 20, 2017
Decompression procedures for transfer under pressure ('TUP') diving.
Jan Risberg1,2, Pieter-Jan van Ooij3, Olav Sande Eftedal4
1NUI, Bergen, Norway.
Transfer under pressure (TUP) diving uses isobaric transfer for decompression. Six air diving decompression tables were compared, with USN and DCD procedures generally showing longer decompression times but potentially lower decompression sickness risk.
Area of Science:
- Commercial Diving
- Decompression Physiology
- Occupational Safety
Background:
- Growing interest in transfer under pressure (TUP) decompression for commercial diving.
- TUP bridges surface-oriented and saturation diving, involving isobaric transfer from a bell to a chamber.
- This method aims to optimize decompression procedures for divers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare six international decompression tables used in air diving.
- To evaluate differences in total decompression time (TDT), oxygen breathing time, and gradient factors (GF high/low).
- To assess surrogate measures for estimating decompression sickness probability (PDCS).
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of six decompression tables: DadCoDat (DCD), Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine (DCIEM), Comex MT92, and United States Navy (USN).
- Evaluation of TDT, oxygen breathing time, GF high, and GF low as outcome measures.
- Assessment of allowances and restrictions for repetitive diving across procedures.
Main Results:
- USN and DCD tables generally recommended longer TDT and oxygen breathing time with lower GF high compared to MT92 and DCIEM.
- USN procedures exhibited significantly higher GF low due to shallower first stops.
- Repetitive diving allowances varied extensively among the six procedures.
Conclusions:
- Experimental validation is lacking for all tables, preventing definitive conclusions on PDCS differences.
- All tables are internationally recognized, with selection potentially influenced by factors beyond PDCS.
- USN and DCD procedures are anticipated to offer lower PDCS than MT92 and DCIEM, though the extent is unknown.
More Related Videos
03:24Author Spotlight: Development and Application of a Novel Suture Technique for Annular Fibrosus Repair in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy
Published on: January 26, 2024
09:22Quantitatively Measuring In situ Flows using a Self-Contained Underwater Velocimetry Apparatus SCUVA
Published on: October 31, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs...
Buoyancy and Stability for Submerged and Floating Bodies
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment: