Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Mixed Reality for Education MRE Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
Published on: June 23, 2023
Similarities and differences between CLASS and ECERS-R estimates of educational environment quality
Daria Bukhalenkova1, Olga Almazova2, Margarita Aslanova1
1Department of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
This study compared the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised (ECERS-R) and Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) for evaluating kindergarten quality. Findings show both methods offer complementary insights into educational environments.
Area of Science:
- Early Childhood Education
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
Background:
- Evaluating the quality of kindergarten educational environments is crucial for child development.
- Existing assessment tools like ECERS-R and CLASS have distinct methodologies.
- Understanding the alignment and divergence between these tools is essential for accurate quality assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the quality assessments of kindergarten educational environments using the ECERS-R and CLASS methods.
- To investigate the correlation and agreement between ECERS-R and CLASS evaluations in Moscow kindergartens.
- To analyze assessment results from a cultural-historical psychology perspective.
Main Methods:
- Application of both ECERS-R and CLASS assessment tools in 83 Moscow kindergarten groups with 5-7-year-old preschoolers.
- Correlation analysis to determine relationships between ECERS-R subscales/total scores and CLASS domains.
- Comparative analysis of groups categorized by low and high educational environment quality based on each method.
Main Results:
- ECERS-R subscales showed limited correlation with the 'Emotional Support' CLASS domain but correlated with the total ECERS-R score.
- The 'Classroom Organization' CLASS domain exhibited the most significant correlations with ECERS-R subscales and total score.
- A good overall agreement was found between ECERS-R and CLASS evaluations, though a non-linear relationship was observed, with some high CLASS scores corresponding to average-low ECERS-R scores.
Conclusions:
- The ECERS-R and CLASS methods provide complementary perspectives on kindergarten educational environment quality.
- While generally agreeing, the methods reveal nuances in quality assessment, highlighting a non-linear relationship between their findings.
- Integrating insights from both ECERS-R and CLASS can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of early childhood educational settings.
Related Concept Videos
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Gene-Environment Interactions
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Heritability
Group Design

