Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter heart interventions
Victor Alfonso Jimenez Diaz1,2, Samir R Kapadia3, Axel Linke4
1Cardiology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Insights
Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) capture debris during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) but haven't yet proven superior for stroke prevention. Further trials are needed to assess CEPDs in TAVR and other procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Neurology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Stroke is a significant complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), occurring in approximately 3% of patients.
- Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) capture embolic debris during TAVR, and imaging studies show they reduce new cerebral lesions.
Conclusions:
- Despite capturing debris, current CEPDs have not demonstrated superiority in preventing TAVR-related strokes in randomized trials.
- Tailored clinical trials are necessary for various CEPD designs and for evaluating their use in non-TAVR procedures.
- Assessing the cost-effectiveness of CEPDs is crucial for global adoption.
Abstract:
Stroke remains a devastating complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), with the incidence of clinically apparent stroke seemingly fixed at around 3% despite TAVR's significant evolution during the past decade. Embolic showers of debris (calcium, atheroma, valve material, foreign material) are captured in the majority of patients who have TAVR using a filter-based cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD). Additionally, in systematic brain imaging studies, the majority of patients receiving TAVR exhibit new cerebral lesions. Mechanistic studies have shown reductions in the volume of new cerebral lesions using CEPDs, yet the first randomised trial powered for periprocedural stroke within 72 hours of a transfemoral TAVR failed to meet its primary endpoint of showing superiority of the SENTINEL CEPD. The present review summarises the clinicopathological rationale for the development of CEPDs, the evidence behind these devices to date and the emerging recognition of cerebral embolisation in many non-TAVR transcatheter procedures. Given the uniqueness of each of the various CEPDs under development, specific trials tailored to their designs will need to be undertaken to broaden the CEPD field, in addition to evaluating the role of CEPD in non-TAVR transcatheter heart interventions. Importantly, the cost-effectiveness of these devices will require assessment to broaden the adoption of CEPDs globally.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

