Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026

Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel
Published on: May 8, 2012
Radial wall strain for residual risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention
Jiayue Huang1,2, Shengxian Tu1, Haocheng Huang3
1Biomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Percutaneous coronary intervention effectively treats flow-limiting stenoses; however, untreated non-target vessels with vulnerable plaques remain a major contributor to future adverse cardiovascular events. Plaque strain is a promising marker of plaque vulnerability but traditionally requires complex modelling and expensive intracoronary imaging. We developed a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for subpixel-level lumen delineation, enabling real-time automated assessment of radial wall strain (RWS) from routine angiography.
Aims:
This post hoc study sought to determine the prognostic value of RWS for predicting future cardiac events in non-target vessels over 5 years, using the high-quality TARGET All Comers randomised trial.
Methods:
This blinded analysis included all 1,551 enrolled patients. Angiographic image quality was independently assessed prior to blinded computation of RWS. A prespecified cutoff value of maximal RWS (RWSmax) ≥13% was used to define increased plaque vulnerability. The primary endpoint was a non-target vessel-oriented composite endpoint (NT-VOCE), a composite of cardiac death, non-target vessel myocardial infarction and non-target vessel revascularisation over 5 years, as prospectively adjudicated in the parent trial. Following blinded RWS analysis, the results were integrated into the trial database, and the outcomes were unblinded and linked to corresponding vessel-level outcomes.
Results:
RWS was successfully evaluated in 1,384 non-target vessels from 802 patients. Baseline RWSmax independently predicted the NT-VOCE, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 4.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.14-7.40; p<0.0001) and an adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.78; p<0.0001). Predictive accuracy was highest for non-target vessel revascularisation (adjusted AUC 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95; p<0.0001). In the subgroup with high-quality angiographic images, RWS demonstrated even greater predictive performance for the NT-VOCE (adjusted HR 6.89, 95% CI: 3.15-15.07; p<0.0001).
Conclusions:
In this retrospective post hoc analysis, RWS was independently associated with long-term adverse events in deferred non-target vessels, with its prognostic value most evident for subsequent non-target vessel revascularisation. Elevated baseline RWSmax was strongly associated with the NT-VOCE, with the highest predictive accuracy in vessels with high-quality angiographic imaging. Ongoing and planned prospective, randomised trials are evaluating the role of RWS-guided risk stratification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

