Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

50.0K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teaching Personalized Doctor-Patient Communication with AI: PerTRAIN - a Prototype for Interpersonally Responsive Virtual Patients in Medical Education.

Perspectives on medical education·2026
Same author

Comparing Trait-Wise and Profile-Wise Approaches to Assess the Links Between Metaperceptions and Romantic Interest During Speed-Dating.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Receiving Applause "From the Right": Punishing Freeriding Is Socially Rewarded by Those High in Right-Wing Authoritarianism.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

Is what is beautiful good and still more accurately understood? A replication and extension of Lorenzo et al. (2010).

European journal of personality·2026
Same author

Managing loved ones' emotions: The promise and pitfalls of reappraisal.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

"Me in a nutshell": Exploring the content and properties of central traits.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K

Examining individual differences in metaperceptive accuracy using the social meta-accuracy model.

Leonie Hater1, Norhan Elsaadawy2, Jeremy C Biesanz3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Munster.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|September 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Individuals differ in their ability to understand how others perceive them. Good generalized meta-accuracy, or knowing one's reputation, is linked to being transparent and extraverted.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Interpersonal Perception
  • Individual Differences

Background:

  • Understanding how others perceive us (meta-accuracy) has significant benefits.
  • Two types of good metaperceivers exist: dyadic (specific impressions) and generalized (reputation).

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce the Social Meta-Accuracy Model (SMAM) to identify and understand good metaperceivers.
  • Investigate the factors contributing to and characteristics of both dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Applied the SMAM framework to four samples of first impression interactions.
  • Analyzed individual differences in dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy.

Main Results:

  • People generally could detect first impressions, but individual differences in dyadic meta-accuracy were minimal.
  • Substantial individual differences were found in generalized meta-accuracy, explained by transparency.
  • Good generalized metaperceivers tended to be extraverted and popular.

Conclusions:

  • The SMAM is effective for identifying and understanding different types of good metaperceivers.
  • Transparency is key for generalized meta-accuracy.
  • Future research should explore meta-accuracy in diverse contexts.