Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

2.8K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
2.8K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

202
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
202
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

428
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
428
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

278
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
278
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

135
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
135
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method01:10

Vector Algebra: Graphical Method

12.2K
Vectors can be multiplied by scalars, added to other vectors, or subtracted from other vectors. The vector sum of two (or more) vectors is called the resultant vector or, for short, the resultant.
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An open dataset of cerebral tau deposition in young healthy adults based on [<sup>18</sup>F]MK6240 positron emission tomography.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Simple input-output dependencies explain neuronal activity.

Nature physics·2026
Same author

Stochastic Morphodynamics of the Human Aorta Across the Lifespan.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Use of artificial intelligence in magnetic resonance imaging across the epileptic patient's journey: A meta-analysis of four clinical applications.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Developmental Change in Structure Learning Reflects a Shift From Recency-Based to Relational Prediction.

Developmental science·2026
Same author

Dynamic limbic-executive decoupling underpins the reciprocal link between drug-resistant state and depression in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Epilepsia·2026
Same journal

MetaboNet-Bench: A Multi-modal Benchmark for Glucose Forecasting in Type 1 Diabetes.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

A Positron Range Correction with Texture Preservation Framework in PET Imaging.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Automated optimization of force field parameters against ensemble-averaged measurements with Bayesian Inference of Conformational Populations.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Droplet Fusion as a Relaxation Process: Comparison with Shape Recovery of Newtonian and Viscoelastic Droplets.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Ridge-filter crosstalk in conformal proton FLASH planning: dependence on beamlet pitch and iterative mitigation.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Electrochemical DNA Hairpin Sensors for Differentiating Small Molecule Intercalation from Minor Groove Binding.

ArXiv·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

261

Human Learning of Hierarchical Graphs.

Xiaohuan Xia1, Andrei A Klishin1, Jennifer Stiso1

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.

Arxiv
|September 21, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans can learn hierarchical structures in event sequences, but learning finer levels of a hierarchy hinders coarser-level learning. This study investigated hierarchical graph learning using simulations and experiments.

More Related Videos

Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array
10:32

Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.9K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

261
Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array
10:32

Brain Mapping Using a Graphene Electrode Array

Published on: October 20, 2023

1.9K
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Network Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Humans process sequential environmental events with statistical regularities.
  • Real-world networks often exhibit hierarchical structures, posing challenges for human learning.
  • Understanding human learning of hierarchical graph topologies is an open research question.

Approach:

  • Investigated human learning of hierarchical graphs using computer simulations and behavioral experiments.
  • Utilized the surprisal effect (slower reaction to unexpected transitions) to probe mental estimates of transition probabilities.
  • Employed mean-field predictions and numerical simulations to analyze surprisal effects in hierarchical structures.

Key Points:

  • Surprisal effects are more pronounced for finer-level hierarchical transitions than coarser-level ones.
  • Coarser-level surprisal effects are difficult to detect with limited learning time or small sample sizes.
  • Human participants (n=100) exhibited a surprisal effect at the finer hierarchy level but not the coarser level.

Conclusions:

  • Human learning of hierarchical graphs is influenced by the level of detail.
  • A trade-off exists in learning: better fine-level learning can impair coarser-level learning, and vice versa.
  • This research provides insights into learning sequential events in hierarchical contexts and guides future neural and behavioral studies.