Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Human Brucellar Spondylodiscitis
Published on: May 23, 2021
Cause analysis of conversion to biologics in spondyloarthritis patients with poor response to conventional treatment
Jun Zhou1, Wenhan Huang1, Zhihuan Zhang1
1Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Objective:
We sought to investigate the reasons why spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients failed to respond to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) and the influences of different initial cDMARDs on the likelihood of a switch to biologics.
Methods:
SpA patients were divided into a conventional drug maintenance group and a biologics conversion group to determine the causes of conversion to biologics. Then, we divided all patients into three groups according to different initial cDMARDs, NSAID monotherapy, NSAID + (sulfasalazine or thalidomide) double combination, and NSAID + sulfasalazine + thalidomide triple combination therapy groups, to clarify the influence of initial treatment on later conversion to biologics.
Results:
This study includes 202 patients, including 97 patients in the conventional drug maintenance group and 105 patients in the biologics conversion group. The mean age of the conventional drug maintenance group was higher than that of the biologics conversion group (40.8 ± 14.3 vs. 33.8 ± 12.3 years, P < 0.05). Uveitis (OR 5.356, P < 0.05) is positively correlated with conversion to biological therapy, while age (OR 0.940, P < 0.05) is negatively correlated. The proportion of NSAID monotherapy, double combination, and triple combination groups converted to biological agents was 80%, 51.1%, and 23.2%, respectively (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Age and uveitis are related to conversion to biologics therapy. The early combination of sulfasalazine and thalidomide with NSAIDs may lower the probability of conversion to biologics therapy in the later stage and offer a new option for patients with limited use of biologics in SpA patients. Key Points • Patients' move to biologics may be caused mostly by inadequate disease control by conventional oral medications. • Regardless of axial vs. peripheral joint involvement, combination drug therapy was superior to single drug therapy in controlling SpA and decreasing the probability of conversion to a biological agent. • For SpA patients who are not candidates for biologics due to contraindications or other reasons, early combination application of NSAIDs, sulfasalazine, and thalidomide may be a new choice.
Insights
Early combination therapy with NSAIDs, sulfasalazine, and thalidomide can reduce the need for biologics in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. This approach offers an alternative for those unable to use biologics due to disease control issues.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Spondyloarthritis (SpA) management often involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs).
- Treatment failure with conventional therapies necessitates understanding reasons for switching to biologics.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate factors leading to treatment failure with NSAIDs and cDMARDs in SpA patients.
- Evaluate the impact of initial cDMARD strategies on the likelihood of transitioning to biologic therapies.
Main Methods:
- Patients were categorized into conventional drug maintenance and biologic conversion groups.
- Initial treatments were classified into NSAID monotherapy, double combination (NSAID + sulfasalazine or thalidomide), and triple combination (NSAID + sulfasalazine + thalidomide) therapy groups.
Main Results:
- Uveitis correlated positively with biologic conversion (OR 5.356), while older age correlated negatively (OR 0.940).
- Conversion rates to biologics were 80% for NSAID monotherapy, 51.1% for double combination, and 23.2% for triple combination therapy (P < 0.05).
- The conventional drug maintenance group was older than the biologics conversion group (40.8 ± 14.3 vs. 33.8 ± 12.3 years, P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Age and uveitis influence the decision to switch to biologics in SpA.
- Early combination therapy (NSAIDs with sulfasalazine and thalidomide) reduces the probability of later biologic conversion.
- Combination drug therapy is superior to monotherapy for SpA control and decreasing biologic conversion, offering an alternative for patients with limited biologic options.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview

