Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

145
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
145
Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

44.6K
Overview
44.6K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

462
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
462
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

208
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
208
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

339
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
339
Principles of Disease Surveillance01:26

Principles of Disease Surveillance

122
Disease surveillance is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data essential to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health practice. This process integrates data dissemination to entities responsible for preventing and controlling disease, injury, and disability. Surveillance systems provide crucial information for action, helping public health authorities make informed decisions to manage and prevent outbreaks, ensure public safety, optimize...
122

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Viewing the Risk Concept as a Boundary Object: Implications for Theory and Practice.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Aligning Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Decision Analysis With Contemporary Risk Conceptualizations: Insights From the Ellsberg Paradox and Related Concepts.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Looking for a Straw in a Haystack by Bridging the Cracks Between Individual Judgments: Narrowing the Knowledge Gap To Anticipate Surprises by Transforming Risk Assessors' Small Worlds Into Large Worlds.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

How Safety Science Can Be Strengthened by Clarifying Its Foundation and Increasing Its Interaction With Risk Science.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Risk Science in Practice: A Framework for Gauging Risk Principles in Domain-Specific Discourse.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

A Classification System for Competing Narratives in a Risk Context.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
07:44

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.2K

A risk science perspective on vaccines.

Ingrid Glette-Iversen1, Terje Aven1, Roger Flage1

  • 1Department of Safety, Economics and Planning, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|September 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Understanding vaccine risks is crucial for public health. This study uses a risk science perspective to clarify how uncertainty impacts vaccine perception and communication, aiming to reduce skepticism.

Keywords:
decision‐makingrisk characterizationrisk communicationvaccination riskvaccine risk

More Related Videos

Protocol for Recombinant RBD-based SARS Vaccines: Protein Preparation, Animal Vaccination and Neutralization Detection
12:09

Protocol for Recombinant RBD-based SARS Vaccines: Protein Preparation, Animal Vaccination and Neutralization Detection

Published on: May 2, 2011

42.9K
Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
09:13

Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

Published on: November 1, 2011

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
07:44

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.2K
Protocol for Recombinant RBD-based SARS Vaccines: Protein Preparation, Animal Vaccination and Neutralization Detection
12:09

Protocol for Recombinant RBD-based SARS Vaccines: Protein Preparation, Animal Vaccination and Neutralization Detection

Published on: May 2, 2011

42.9K
Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
09:13

Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy

Published on: November 1, 2011

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Science
  • Public Health
  • Risk Analysis

Background:

  • Vaccines are vital medical advancements, yet vaccine skepticism, particularly concerning COVID-19, remains a significant public health challenge.
  • Evaluating vaccine efficacy and safety involves complex risk assessment, which is often difficult to communicate effectively.
  • Skepticism extends beyond mere safety and effectiveness concerns, encompassing broader societal factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To offer new insights into the understanding, perception, communication, and management of vaccine risks.
  • To apply a contemporary risk science perspective to analyze vaccine-related issues.
  • To clarify the interplay between risk, uncertainty, knowledge, and probability in the context of vaccination.

Main Methods:

  • Adoption of a contemporary risk science framework.
  • Analysis of the relationships between risk, uncertainty, knowledge, and probability.
  • Examination of factors influencing vaccine skepticism beyond safety and efficacy.

Main Results:

  • The risk science perspective provides a clearer framework for understanding vaccine risks.
  • Clarifying the role of uncertainty enhances the characterization of vaccine risks.
  • Improved understanding of the multifaceted nature of vaccine skepticism.

Conclusions:

  • A contemporary risk science approach can improve the understanding and communication of vaccine risks.
  • Addressing uncertainty is key to mitigating vaccine hesitancy.
  • This framework offers a pathway to better public engagement with vaccination issues.