Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Aligning Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Decision Analysis With Contemporary Risk Conceptualizations: Insights From the
1University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
None:
One of the most well-known foundational concepts in decision analysis is the Ellsberg paradox. It shows that people prefer alternatives where the probabilities are objective compared to alternatives where the probabilities are vague (uncertain, ambiguous). This fact challenges the expected utility theory, which is founded on the idea that people base their decisions on probabilities and utilities of different outcomes. This article discusses this paradox and other similar decision analysis concepts and observations in relation to risk science and contemporary knowledge on how to conceptualize and characterize risk. The main aim of the article is to show that the Ellsberg paradox and related concepts and observations reinforce contemporary risk conceptualizations with their idea of seeing uncertainty as a main component of risk.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
