Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025
Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
Eye of the Carpenter: How Well do Orthopaedic Surgeons Estimate Angular Measurements in Derotational Osteotomies?
Nathan Chaclas1, Olivia Dyer2, Alexander Mayers2
1Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton.
Background:
Femoral derotational osteotomies are used by orthopaedic surgeons to decrease version in a variety of pathologies. Intraoperatively, the goal of the surgery is to decrease the rotation of the femur to within physiological range. Surgeons generally visually estimate the angle of correction based on bone markers at the rotating cylindrical portion of the femur. This study sought first to assess the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of surgeons with respect to angle creation, and then to implement a training intervention.
Methods:
A rotational femur model was constructed and tested among surgeons and nonsurgeons. Surgeons were then randomized into an experimental and control cohort with training on the model as the intervention. Subjects were asked to create target angles of 15, 30, 45, and 60 degrees using only Kirschner wires and then only bone marks for reference. Independent and paired t -tests were performed to determine variability between cohorts.
Results:
The mean angle creation error and range of the surgeon cohort were significantly lower than those of the nonsurgeon cohort. Within the nonsurgeon cohort, the mean angle creation error and range of the wire modality were significantly lower than that of the mark modality. The mean angle creation error and range of the trained cohort were significantly lower than the untrained cohort.
Conclusions:
The considerable inter-subject range within the surgeon cohort highlights a need for the reinforcement of basic geometric principles within orthopaedic instruction. This model allows for immediate, accurate feedback on angle creation, and training appears to be both time and cost-effective. The physiological range allows for a level of variability between surgical outcomes without consequence. However, the more than 20 degree range determined by this study does not fall within those bounds and should be addressed.
Clinical Relevance:
Moving forward, rotational estimation as a surgical skill should increase in prominence within orthopaedic instruction to maximize future joint health, and additional emphasis should be placed on fundamental spatial orientation during training.
