Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Establishment of a Robust and Reproducible Model of Radiation-Induced Skin and Muscle Fibrosis

Establishment of a Robust and Reproducible Model of Radiation-Induced Skin and Muscle Fibrosis

Published on: August 31, 2022

RRIMS: Radiation Risk In Mammography Screening - model evaluation

Sahand Hooshmand¹, Warren M Reed¹, Mo'ayyad E Suleiman¹

¹Faculty of Medicine and Health, Discipline of Medical Imaging Sciences, The University of Sydney, SusanWakil Health Building (D18), Sydney, Australia.

The British Journal of Radiology

|September 26, 2023

Abstract

Objective:

The Radiation Risk In Mammography Screening (RRIMS) model was introduced as a novel tool to help females accurately calculate their lifetime mean glandular dose (MGD) and estimate their population-level risk of radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality.

Methods:

The model's accuracy was evaluated by comparing the received MGD of 317 women who had undergone a total of 733 visits across one to four rounds of screening. This was achieved by comparing the RRIMS predicted dose values with the same examination dose calculated manually by hand. Qualitative and quantitative statistical analyses were performed to assess the percentage difference (% diff) or agreement between the two values.

Results:

Qualitative statistical analysis using the Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a statistically significant bias for the % diff between the manually calculated and RRIMS predicted dose values, where the mean (bias) was -2.02% with an upper and lower limit of agreement of 40.24% and -44.27%, respectively. Quantitative statistical analysis revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 3,1) of 0.64 (p-value < 0.001) and a Kendall's W of 0.83 (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion:

The results indicate a statistically significant and reasonably good level of agreement between the manually calculated vs RRIMS predicted dose values. This work was focused on one of the major mammography equipment manufacturers that is Hologic, however there is potential for a multivendor applicability study of this model with future iterations. This will further improve upon this innovative dose and risk prediction tool that can empower healthcare professionals when making informed decisions and enhance patient care.

Advances In Knowledge:

This paper assesses the precision of the dose and risk model that our team has previously established. The results bring us one step closer to providing females and clinicians with a useful tool that can help explain and contextualise the benefits and risks associated with screening mammography.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage 40-300 kV X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...

X-ray Imaging

X-ray Imaging

German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

A novel deep learning-based grading system for assessing breast arterial calcification on mammograms, as an independent risk factor for predicting adverse cardiovascular events.

La Radiologia medica·2026

Amplifying image quality gain in x-ray phase contrast imaging of mastectomy samples with deep learning denoising.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026

Semi-Supervised Deep Learning-Based Model for Segmentation of Breast Arterial Calcification on Screening Mammograms.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2025

Factors associated with junior doctor plain trauma X-ray interpretation accuracy and strategies for improvement: a scoping review.

BMC medical imaging·2025

Radiation Risk in 2D Mammography Screening: A Scoping Review of Modelling Strategies and Emerging AI Applications.

Journal of medical radiation sciences·2025

Image quality in ultra-low-dose chest CT versus chest x-rays guiding paediatric cystic fibrosis care.

European radiology·2025

See all related articles