Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Maximum Augmented Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Categorical Marginal Models for Large Sparse Contingency Tables
L Andries van der Ark1, Wicher P Bergsma2, Letty Koopman3
1Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15776, 1001, NG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. L.A.vanderArk@uva.nl.
Abstract:
Categorical marginal models (CMMs) are flexible tools for modelling dependent or clustered categorical data, when the dependencies themselves are not of interest. A major limitation of maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of CMMs is that the size of the contingency table increases exponentially with the number of variables, so even for a moderate number of variables, say between 10 and 20, ML estimation can become computationally infeasible. An alternative method, which retains the optimal asymptotic efficiency of ML, is maximum empirical likelihood (MEL) estimation. However, we show that MEL tends to break down for large, sparse contingency tables. As a solution, we propose a new method, which we call maximum augmented empirical likelihood (MAEL) estimation and which involves augmentation of the empirical likelihood support with a number of well-chosen cells. Simulation results show good finite sample performance for very large contingency tables.
Related Concept Videos
Contingency Table
Determination of Expected Frequency
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Fisher's Exact Test
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

