Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.2K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.2K
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

683
Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
683
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

117
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
117
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

172
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
172
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

742
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates...
742

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Effects of a guided digital intervention on sleep and mental health outcomes in university students - a randomized controlled trial.

Sleep·2025
Same author

Mixture multigroup structural equation modeling: A novel method for comparing structural relations across many groups.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

A Comparison of Measures for Assessing Profile Similarity in Dyads.

Psychologica Belgica·2024
Same author

Maximum Augmented Empirical Likelihood Estimation of Categorical Marginal Models for Large Sparse Contingency Tables.

Psychometrika·2023
Same author

Outliers may not be automatically removed.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Beyond Pearson's Correlation: Modern Nonparametric Independence Tests for Psychological Research.

Julian D Karch1, Andres F Perez-Alonso2, Wicher P Bergsma3

  • 1Methodology and Statistics Department, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|August 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Modern nonparametric independence tests, like distance correlation and HHG-Pearson, show greater power than traditional methods for detecting relationships between variables in psychological research.

Keywords:
Relationshipcorrelationhypothesis testindependencenonparametric

More Related Videos

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.5K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.5K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychological Research Methods

Background:

  • Traditional methods for assessing variable association include Pearson's, Kendall's, and Spearman's correlation coefficients.
  • These traditional tests are limited in their ability to detect diverse relationship types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore modern nonparametric independence tests as alternatives to traditional correlation coefficients.
  • To evaluate the performance of existing and novel nonparametric tests, including the Heller-Heller-Gorfine-Pearson (HHG-Pearson) test, in detecting various relationships.

Main Methods:

  • A simulation study was conducted to compare the power of traditional independence tests against modern nonparametric independence tests.
  • The study examined performance across various relationship types commonly found in psychological research.

Main Results:

  • No single test demonstrated maximum power across all relationship types.
  • Distance correlation and HHG-Pearson tests exhibited substantially higher power than traditional tests for many relationships.
  • HHG-Pearson showed a slight advantage over distance correlation in some scenarios, while distance correlation performed better for linear relationships.

Conclusions:

  • Modern nonparametric tests, particularly distance correlation and HHG-Pearson, offer superior power for detecting variable associations compared to traditional methods.
  • Distance correlation is recommended as a potentially valuable addition or alternative to traditional methods in psychological research, especially when the nature of the relationship is unknown.