Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

10:50
Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
Published on: November 8, 2018
10.9K
Learning from in-group and out-group models induces separative effects on human mate copying
Jiajia Xie1, Lin Li2, Yang Lu3,4
1Department of Psychology, Normal College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
|September 27, 2023
Summary
Mate copying is influenced by social learning, with group affiliation impacting mate choice. Observing out-group models requires more cognitive resources to overcome in-group bias during acceptance copying.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Evolutionary Psychology
Background:
- Mate copying is a social learning strategy where individuals observe others' mating choices.
- Previous research focused on individual model attributes, neglecting the influence of group affiliation.
- Understanding how group membership (in-group vs. out-group) affects mate copying is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether and how group attributes of models influence mate copying behavior.
- To examine the neural mechanisms underlying mate copying from in-group versus out-group models.
- To explore the role of the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and anterior medial prefrontal cortex (amPFC) in social learning of mate preferences.
Main Methods:
- Behavioral experiments assessing willingness to choose potential mates before and after observing female models' choices.
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain activity and connectivity during mate copying tasks.
- Comparison of responses to in-group versus out-group models and acceptance versus rejection copying scenarios.
Main Results:
- Participants' mate preferences shifted to align with observed models' choices (acceptance or rejection).
- Acceptance copying was stronger than rejection copying and modulated by model group affiliation.
- Observing out-group models led to a discounting copying effect, with increased TPJ activity and TPJ-amPFC connectivity, predicting greater rating changes.
Conclusions:
- Mate copying is influenced by the social group affiliation of the observed models.
- Acceptance copying from out-group members requires greater cognitive resources to overcome in-group bias.
- TPJ and amPFC engagement suggests a role in inferring intentions and managing social information from dissimilar individuals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Mate Choice
8.1K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.1K
Nonconscious Mimicry
4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K

