Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The number of drones to inseminate a queen with has little potential for optimization of honeybee breeding programs.

Hereditas·2024
Same author

Comparison of pooled semen insemination and single colony insemination as sustainable honeybee breeding strategies.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

First large-scale genomic prediction in the honey bee.

Heredity·2023
Same author

Consequences of incorrect genetic parameter estimates for single-trait and multi-trait genetic evaluations in honeybees.

Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie·2022
Same author

Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2022
Same author

Simulation studies to optimize genomic selection in honey bees.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

8.2K

The Potential of Instrumental Insemination for Sustainable Honeybee Breeding.

Manuel Du1, Richard Bernstein1, Andreas Hoppe1

  • 1Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, 16540 Hohen Neuendorf, Germany.

Genes
|September 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Instrumental insemination offers a viable alternative to isolated mating stations for honeybee breeding, yielding higher genetic gain with comparable inbreeding rates. This method is particularly effective when isolated mating sites are limited.

Keywords:
genetic gainhoneybee breedinginbreedinginstrumental inseminationsustainable breeding

More Related Videos

Evaluating the Effect of Environmental Chemicals on Honey Bee Development from the Individual to Colony Level
07:39

Evaluating the Effect of Environmental Chemicals on Honey Bee Development from the Individual to Colony Level

Published on: April 1, 2017

9.2K
A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research
10:31

A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research

Published on: September 8, 2014

35.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors
08:50

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

Published on: July 16, 2018

8.2K
Evaluating the Effect of Environmental Chemicals on Honey Bee Development from the Individual to Colony Level
07:39

Evaluating the Effect of Environmental Chemicals on Honey Bee Development from the Individual to Colony Level

Published on: April 1, 2017

9.2K
A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research
10:31

A Proboscis Extension Response Protocol for Investigating Behavioral Plasticity in Insects: Application to Basic, Biomedical, and Agricultural Research

Published on: September 8, 2014

35.4K

Area of Science:

  • Apiculture and Animal Breeding
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Insect Reproductive Biology

Background:

  • Honeybee breeding programs rely on isolated mating stations (IMS) for mating control, but providing sufficient IMS is a challenge.
  • Instrumental insemination (II) is used in research but its potential to substitute IMS in large-scale breeding has been underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of instrumental insemination (II) strategies versus mating on isolated mating stations (IMS) in honeybee breeding.
  • To evaluate the impact of paternal generation intervals on genetic gain and inbreeding in honeybee populations.

Main Methods:

  • Stochastic simulations were employed to model and compare II strategies with IMS mating.
  • The study analyzed genetic progress and inbreeding development over a 70-year period.
  • Paternal generation intervals (2-3 years) were a key variable in the simulations.

Main Results:

  • Instrumental insemination (II) demonstrated up to 42% higher genetic gain compared to IMS strategies after 70 years, especially with limited mating sites.
  • Inbreeding rates were comparable between II and IMS methods.
  • Shortening the paternal generation interval to two years in II resulted in the highest generational inbreeding rates (up to 2.28%).

Conclusions:

  • Instrumental insemination (II) is a viable and promising alternative to isolated mating stations (IMS) for honeybee breeding programs.
  • II strategies, particularly using drones from a single colony, can significantly enhance genetic gain.
  • Optimizing paternal generation intervals in II is crucial for balancing genetic gain and inbreeding levels.