Usefulness of programmed stimulation in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

The response to programmed electrical stimulation and the clinical outcome was determined in 47 patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DC). Thirteen patients (group 1) presented with sustained uniform ventricular tachycardia (VT), 14 (group 2) presented with cardiac arrest and 20 (group 3) presented with nonsustained VT. The mean ejection fraction of the study population was 28 +/- 9%. The response to programmed stimulation was related to arrhythmia presentation. In all patients in group 1 sustained, uniform VT was induced, compared with 1 patient in group 2 and 2 patients in group 3 (p less than 0.001). There were 14 sudden cardiac deaths and 1 cardiac arrest during a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 14 months. The only 4 patients who presented with sustained VT or a cardiac arrest in whom sustained arrhythmia induction was suppressed with antiarrhythmic therapy remain alive. Nine of the 23 patients (4 in group 2 and 5 in group 3) in whom no sustained ventricular arrhythmia was induced died suddenly, with 5 of the 9 receiving empiric antiarrhythmic therapy. Three other patients, who had a slower and hemodynamically tolerated VT at the time of arrhythmia induction, died suddenly. Thus, in patients with nonischemic DC, uniform, sustained VT is always and almost solely initiated in patients who present with this arrhythmia; although few patients presenting with sustained VT or cardiac arrest have inducibility of the arrhythmias suppressed with therapy, if it is suppressed the patient appears to have a good prognosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)