Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

14:55
Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
Published on: January 20, 2023
3.4K
Crash frequency prediction based on extreme value theory using roadside lidar-based vehicle trajectory data.
Nischal Bhattarai1, Yibin Zhang1, Hongchao Liu1
1Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|September 28, 2023
Summary
This study uses roadside LiDAR data to identify near-crashes, improving crash prediction models. Combining surrogate safety measures with extreme value theory offers a proactive approach to traffic safety analysis.
Area of Science:
- Traffic safety engineering
- Transportation data analytics
- LiDAR technology applications
Background:
- Traditional crash prediction models (CPMs) often rely on unreliable historical crash data.
- Near-crash prediction offers a proactive approach to enhance traffic safety.
- Roadside LiDAR provides high-resolution vehicle trajectory data for detailed movement analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a methodology for identifying near-crashes using Roadside LiDAR data.
- To apply surrogate safety measures and extreme value theory (EVT) for crash probability estimation.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different surrogate measure pairs in predicting crash frequencies.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Roadside LiDAR to collect microscopic vehicle trajectory data.
- Identified near-crashes using surrogate indicators: Time to Collision (TTC), Post Encroachment Time (PET), Anticipated Collision Time (ACT), and Maximum Deceleration (MaxD).
- Applied bivariate extreme value theory (EVT) to combine time-based and evasive-action-based surrogate measures for crash probability prediction.
Main Results:
- The bivariate EVT model showed a better fit for conflict extremes and improved crash frequency prediction compared to univariate models.
- The ACT and MaxD pair demonstrated the highest accuracy in the bivariate model.
- The TTC and MaxD pair effectively reflected relative threat levels at intersections.
Conclusions:
- The proposed methodology enables proactive safety analysis of signalized intersections using Roadside LiDAR data.
- Combining surrogate safety measures with bivariate EVT enhances the accuracy of near-crash prediction.
- This approach provides a foundation for data-driven traffic safety improvements.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Rapidly Varying Flow
93
Rapidly varying flow (RVF) in open channels is characterized by abrupt changes in flow depth over a short distance, with the rate of depth change relative to distance often approaching unity. These flows are inherently complex due to their transient and multi-dimensional nature, making exact analysis difficult. However, approximate solutions using simplified models provide valuable insights into their behavior.Key Features of Rapidly Varying FlowRVF is commonly observed in scenarios involving...
93
Elastic Collisions: Case Study
14.2K
Elastic collision of a system demands conservation of both momentum and kinetic energy. To solve problems involving one-dimensional elastic collisions between two objects, the equations for conservation of momentum and conservation of internal kinetic energy can be used. For the two objects, the sum of momentum before the collision equals the total momentum after the collision. An elastic collision conserves internal kinetic energy, and so the sum of kinetic energies before the collision equals...
14.2K
Prediction Intervals
2.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
2.3K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
7.4K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
7.4K
Random Error
922
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
922

