Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Hemostatic Profiles of Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Versus
Jonathon Paul Fanning1, Shaun Roberts2, Chris Anstey3
1Intensive Care Services, St. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia; Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients exhibit a more prothrombotic state compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) patients. This suggests current antithrombotic guidelines extrapolated from PCI may not be suitable for TAVR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Hematology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Current antithrombotic prophylaxis guidelines for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are largely derived from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data.
- The pathobiologic validity of extrapolating PCI antithrombotic strategies to TAVR remains uncertain.
- Understanding early perioperative coagulation changes is crucial for optimizing TAVR antithrombotic management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare temporal coagulation changes in the early perioperative period among patients undergoing TAVR, PCI, and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
- To assess the hemostatic profiles of TAVR patients relative to PCI and SAVR cohorts.
- To evaluate the clinical implications for current antithrombotic prophylaxis guidelines in TAVR.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study involving 27 TAVR, 12 PCI, and 12 SAVR patients.
- Blood samples collected at four time points: baseline, post-heparin, end-of-procedure, and 6 hours post-procedure.
- Coagulation assessed using standard laboratory tests and advanced viscoelastic whole blood assays (ROTEM sigma, TEG 6s).
Main Results:
- TAVR patients demonstrated a more prothrombotic hemostatic profile compared to PCI and SAVR patients.
- Significant differences in prothrombotic state observed between TAVR and SAVR post-heparin, and between TAVR and PCI at 6 hours post-procedure.
- ROTEM and TEG parameters showed good correlation but were not interchangeable.
Conclusions:
- Patients undergoing TAVR exhibit a distinct, more prothrombotic hemostatic profile than those undergoing PCI or SAVR.
- Findings challenge the current practice of extrapolating antithrombotic regimens from PCI to TAVR.
- Further research is warranted to establish TAVR-specific antithrombotic strategies.
Abstract:
Guidelines for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) antithrombotic prophylaxis are extrapolated predominantly from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data. Here, we examined temporal coagulation changes occurring in the early perioperative period to determine the pathobiologic validity of this supposition. This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR (n = 27), PCI (n = 12), or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping (n = 12). Blood samples were taken at 4 time points: T1 (baseline), after general anesthesia or sedation; T2, after heparin administration; T3, at the end of the procedure; and T4, 6 hours after the procedure. The samples were assessed concurrently using standard laboratory coagulation tests and viscoelastic tests of whole blood clotting, including the latest generation thromboelastometry (ROTEM sigma) and thromboelastometry (TEG 6s). Patients in the TAVR cohort were older and a had lower baseline hemoglobin level than patients in the PCI and SAVR cohorts. The baseline platelet function was similar between the TAVR and PCI cohorts and impaired in the SAVR cohort Figure S1. The baseline hemostatic measures were comparable among cohorts. Regarding the per-patient change from baseline, the TAVR cohort showed an overall more prothrombotic state than the other cohorts, with the most marked differences from the SAVR cohort after intraoperative heparin administration and from the PCI cohorts 6 hours after the procedure. In addition, the ROTEM and TEG parameters were well correlated but not interchangeable. In conclusion, patients who underwent TAVR have a more prothrombotic hemostatic profile than PCI and SAVR patients. These findings question the current guidelines that extrapolate antithrombotic regimens from PCI to TAVR settings.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

