Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Cold snare defect protrusion and incomplete polyp resection after forced cold snare polypectomy: a prospective
Jun Arimoto1, Hideyuki Chiba1, Keiji Yamada1
1Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Ota-ku, Japan.
Forcible cold snare polypectomy (FCSP) may increase the risk of incomplete polyp resection and cold snare defect protrusions. This technique was used in 8% of cases, with no increase in perforation rates.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Surgery
Background:
- Cold snare defect protrusions (CSDPs) after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) indicate incomplete polyp resection (IPR).
- Difficult polyp resections sometimes require a forcible pull on the snare, termed forced CSP (FCSP).
- FCSP has not been previously evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the frequency, safety, and validity of FCSP.
- To compare FCSP with conventional CSP.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study from November 2020 to June 2021.
- Conventional CSP involved snaring alone; FCSP required a forcible pull by the endoscopist.
- Evaluated CSDP rates, IPR rates, and perforation rates.
Main Results:
- FCSP was used in 8% of 1315 polyp removals (105 cases).
- CSDP rates were significantly higher with FCSP (96.2%) than conventional CSP (6.4%).
- IPR rates were higher with FCSP (12.5%) versus conventional CSP (6.2%).
- Perforation rate was 0% for both techniques.
- Cecal location and polyps ≥6mm were risk factors for FCSP.
Conclusions:
- FCSP was performed in 8% of cases and may be associated with increased CSDP and IPR.
- Further research is needed to confirm these findings regarding FCSP efficacy and safety.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
06:13Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018