Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California: Investigating the Legal/Demographic Factors that Make the Difference
Nadav Goldschmied1, Ally Ramona1, Eden Stilman1
1University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract:
In light of California's passage of Proposition 57 in 2016, the present study examined the relationship between legal/demographic variables and decisions to transfer juveniles to the adult court system. Following Prop 57, transfer decisions were entrusted solely with judges and prosecutors could no longer direct file. We used a sample of 106 reports written by forensic psychologists on behalf of the defense examining the life circumstances of minors who allegedly committed serious crimes. Close to two-thirds of minors were kept in the juvenile system whereas the rest were transferred. Utilizing regression analysis, we found that minors with at least one murder charge were more likely to end up in adult court. In regards to race, we detected an overall considerable overrepresentation of Black and Latino juveniles and an underrepresentation of Whites with charges against them but no support of racial bias in transfer decisions in our restricted data set.
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and...
Emerging Adulthood
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

