Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025
Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Multi-staged vs Single-staged Pelvic Osteotomy in the Modern Treatment of Cloacal Exstrophy: Bridging the Gap
Ahmad Haffar1, Alexander M Hirsch1, Chad B Crigger1
1James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, Douglas A. Canning M.D. Exstrophy Database Center, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Purpose:
Staged pelvic osteotomy has been shown in the past to be an effective tool in the closure of the extreme pubic diastasis of cloacal exstrophy. The authors sought to compare orthopedic complications between non-staged pelvic osteotomies and staged pelvic osteotomies in cloacal exstrophy.
Methods:
A prospectively maintained exstrophy-epispadias complex database of 1510 patients was reviewed for cloacal exstrophy bladder closure events performed with osteotomy at the authors' institution. Bladder closure failure was defined as any fascial dehiscence, bladder prolapse, or vesicocutaneous fistula within one year of closure. There was a total of 172 cloacal exstrophy and cloacal exstrophy variant patients within the database and only closures at the authors' institution were included.
Results:
64 closure events fitting the inclusion criteria were identified in 61 unique patients. Staged osteotomy was performed in 42 closure events and non-staged in 22 closures. Complications occurred in 46/64 closure events, with 16 grade III/IV complications. There were no associations between staged osteotomy and overall complication or grade III/IV complications (p = 0.6344 and p = 0.1286, respectively). Of the 46 total complications, 12 were orthopedic complications with 6 complications being grade III/IV. Staged osteotomy closure events experienced 10/42 orthopedic complications while non-staged osteotomy closures experienced 2/22 orthopedic complications, however this did not reach significance (p = 0.1519). Of the 64 closure events, 57 resulted in successful closure with 6 failures and one closure with planned cystectomy.
Conclusion:
This study confirms, in a larger series, superior outcomes when using staged pelvic osteotomy in cloacal exstrophy bladder closure. Staged osteotomy was shown to be a safe alternative to non-staged osteotomy that can decrease the risk of closure failure in this group. Staged pelvic osteotomy should be considered in all patients undergoing cloacal exstrophy bladder closure.
Type Of Study:
Treatment study.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
