Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Visual System
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
Language and Cognition
Morphogenesis
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
The properties of panels in global comics: frequency and size of 76 K panels in 1,030 comics from 144 countries.
Whoosh! visual depictions of direction, speed, and temporality: a corpus analysis of motion events in global comics.
Understanding lightbulb moments: Meaning-making in visual morphology from comics and emoji.
Mark the Unexpected! Animacy Preference and Directed Movement in Visual Language.
Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences.
Are We Moving Too Fast?: Representation of Speed in Static Images.
Let the kids play: Children's folklore, Newell's paradox, and the triviality barrier.
Variable cultural acquisition costs may explain contextual variation in peer cultures.
What's special about peer cultures? The opportunity for disagreement.
The adaptive role of peer culture is shaped by risk landscapes.
Hidden cultures: How parental control shapes children's cultural adaptation in East Asian societies.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
Visual languages and the problems with ideographies: A commentary on Morin.
Neil Cohn1, Joost Schilperoord1
1Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands neilcohn@visuallanguagelab.com; www.visuallanguagelab.com j.schilperoord@tilburguniversity.edu.
Ideographies are limited due to their artificial nature, unlike natural graphic systems which exhibit standardization and complex sequencing capabilities. This study explores the inherent limitations of ideographic systems compared to natural graphic representations.
More Related Videos
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Area of Science:
- Linguistics
- Semiotics
- Graphic Systems
Background:
- The study addresses Morin's argument on the limitations of ideographic systems.
- It contrasts the standardization capacity of ideographies with natural graphic systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the limitations of ideographic systems.
- To compare the standardization and combinatorial properties of ideographies and natural graphic systems.
- To investigate why ideographies fail to function effectively as writing systems.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of ideographic and natural graphic systems.
- Examination of standardization and combinatorial structures within graphic codes.
- Theoretical argumentation based on semiotic principles.
Main Results:
- Natural graphic systems demonstrate robust standardization and complex sequencing.
- Ideographies lack the capacity for proliferating standardization inherent in natural systems.
- The limitations of ideographies stem from their artificial imposition onto writing system structures.
Conclusions:
- Ideographies are fundamentally limited by their artificiality.
- Natural graphic systems offer superior standardization and combinatorial flexibility.
- Forcing ideographies to emulate writing systems leads to inherent functional deficits.