Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

127
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
127
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods01:18

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

297
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
297
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

182
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
182

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the foundations of forensic identification evidence: A critical examination of proficiency test design and results.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Artificial transneurons emulate neuronal activity in different areas of brain cortex.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Ineffectiveness of the "consistent with" judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony.

Law and human behavior·2025
Same author

Partitioning the Expected Value of Countermeasures with an Application to Terrorism.

Decision analysis : a journal of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences·2025
Same author

A call for open science in forensics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

A scientist's take on scientific evidence in the courtroom.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K

Scientific guidelines for evaluating the validity of forensic feature-comparison methods.

Nicholas Scurich1, David L Faigman2, Thomas D Albright3

  • 1Department of Psychological Science, Department of Criminology, Law and Society, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|October 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Courts need scientific validity for forensic evidence. New guidelines, inspired by epidemiology, assess the reliability of forensic comparison methods, using firearm and tool mark examination as an example.

Keywords:
Daubertdecision-makingforensic sciencemeasurementresearch methodology

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

472
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Legal science
  • Forensic science
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Courts require scientific standards for factual questions involving measurement, association, and causality.
  • Applied sciences like medicine and engineering follow a path from discovery to theory, invention, prediction, and validation.
  • Many forensic science disciplines lack basic science roots, sound theories, and empirical validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose four guidelines for establishing the validity of forensic comparison methods.
  • To adapt the Bradford Hill Guidelines from epidemiology for use in forensic science.
  • To provide a framework for assessing the scientific validity of forensic disciplines.

Main Methods:

  • Developed four general guidelines for validating forensic comparison methods.
  • Drew inspiration from the Bradford Hill Guidelines for causal inference in epidemiology.
  • Applied the proposed guidelines to the discipline of firearm and tool mark examination.

Main Results:

  • The proposed guidelines offer a structured approach to evaluating the scientific validity of forensic methods.
  • The framework highlights the need for theoretical grounding and empirical validation in forensic science.
  • Firearm and tool mark examination serves as a case study for applying the guidelines.

Conclusions:

  • The guidelines provide a robust framework for assessing the scientific validity of forensic comparison methods.
  • Establishing scientific validity is crucial for ensuring the reliability of evidence in legal contexts.
  • The proposed framework encourages a more rigorous, science-based approach to forensic analysis.