Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
COVID-lateral Damage: Impact of the Post-COVID-19 Era on Procedural Training in Emergency Medicine Residency
Daniel Frank1, Thomas Perera2, Moshe Weizberg3,4
1Zucker Hofstra School of Medicine, Northwell Health, South Shore University Hospital, Bay Shore, New York.
Insights
The COVID-19 pandemic reduced emergency medicine residents' procedural experience, with significant decreases in critical and fast-track procedures. Training programs should consider simulation and additional rotations to compensate for this learning gap.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Emergency Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to healthcare systems globally.
- Emergency department (ED) volumes decreased substantially in New York following the pandemic's peak in March-April 2020.
- This decline raised concerns about the impact on emergency medicine (EM) residents' procedural training.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of decreased ED volumes on the procedural experience of EM residents.
- To compare the number of critical care and fast-track procedures performed by residents during the pandemic's aftermath with pre-pandemic periods.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted across three EM residency programs in New York.
- Data on procedures performed by EM residents were collected for May-July 2020 and compared to the same periods in 2019 and 2018.
- Procedures were categorized as critical care (e.g., endotracheal intubation, central lines) or fast-track (e.g., laceration repair, splints).
Main Results:
- Total critical care procedures decreased by 12.7% in May-July 2020 compared to the previous year, contrasting with an 8.1% increase the prior year.
- Fast-track procedures saw a significant decline of 35.9% in 2020, compared to a 1.5% decrease in 2019.
- Specific procedures like cardioversion (-33.3%), chest tubes (-27.9%), and procedural sedation (-30.8%) decreased, while central lines (+19.0%) and reductions (+33.3%) increased.
Conclusions:
- EM residents experienced a reduction in both critical and fast-track procedural volume following the COVID-19 peak.
- Training programs should explore strategies like simulation labs and enhanced clinical rotations to mitigate the impact on resident education.
- Addressing these training deficits is crucial for maintaining competency in emergency medicine.
Abstract:
Introduction: Hospitalizations during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic peaked in New York in March-April 2020. In the months following, emergency department (ED) volumes declined. Our objective in this study was to examine the effect of this decline on the procedural experience of emergency medicine (EM) residents compared to the pre-pandemic period. Methods: We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients seen and key procedures performed by EM residents at hospitals spanning three Accreditation Committee for Graduate Medical Education-approved EM residencies in New York City and Nassau County, NY. We obtained numbers of procedures performed during May-July 2020 and compared them to the same time period for 2019 and 2018. We a priori classified critical care procedures-cardioversion, central lines, chest tubes, procedural sedation, and endotracheal intubation. We also studied "fast-track" procedures-fracture/joint reduction, incision and drainage (I&D), laceration repairs, and splints. Results: Total number of critical care procedures in the months following the COVID-19 peak decreased from 694 to 606 (-12.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.3-15.4%), compared to an increase from 642 to 694 (+8.1%, 95% CI 6.1-10.5%) the previous year (difference -9.3%). Total number of fast-track procedures decreased from 5,253 to 3,369 (-35.9%, 95% CI 34.6-37.2%), compared to a decrease from 5,333 to 5,253 (-1.5%, 95% CI 1.2-1.9%) the year before (difference -36.3%). Specific critical care procedures performed in 2020 compared to the mean of 2019 and 2018 as follows: cardioversion -33.3%; central lines +19.0%; chest tubes -27.9%; procedural sedation -30.8%; endotracheal intubation -13.8%. Specific fast-track procedures: reductions +33.3%; I&D -48.6%; laceration repair -17.3%; and splint application -49.8%. Conclusion: Emergency medicine residents' critical and fast-track procedural experience at five hospitals was reduced during the months following the COVID-19 peak in comparison to a similar period in the two years prior. Training programs may consider increasing simulation-lab and cadaver-lab experiences, as well as ED and critical care rotations for their residents to offset this trend.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

