Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

376
Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
376
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.6K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.6K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.5K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.5K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

64
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
64
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.6K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.9K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Linking Minimally Important Differences (MID) and Acceptable Regret to Elicit Values and Preferences in Health Decision Models.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same author

How to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE: an evidence-based decision-analytical approach.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

GRADE Guidance: Update on Developing Good Practice Statements in Guidelines.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Theory of clinical therapeutic progress: reconciling equipoise with fat-tailed (skewed) outcomes.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025
Same author

Converting Evidence-Based Summary of Findings Evidence Tables Into Decision Analytical, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) and Life Expectancies Metrics: A Tutorial.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2025
Same journal

Clinical Trials and Translational Advances in Metabolic Targeting.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
Same journal

Tools and Technologies for Studying Cancer Metabolism.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
Same journal

Cancer and Immune Cells: A Metabolic Battle in the Tumor Microenvironment.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
Same journal

Biomarkers of Cancer Metabolism and Therapeutic Response.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
Same journal

Targeting Metabolism in Cancer Therapy: Inhibitors and Approaches.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
Same journal

Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Stem Cells.

Cancer treatment and research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K

Which Threshold Model?

Benjamin Djulbegovic1, Iztok Hozo2

  • 1Hematology Stewardship Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. djulbegov@musc.edu.

Cancer Treatment and Research
|October 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This book proposes the threshold model to solve the Sorites paradox. It addresses how continuous scientific evidence informs categorical decisions.

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.7K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Decision Theory
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • The Sorites paradox highlights challenges in applying vague predicates to continuous phenomena.
  • Existing decision-making frameworks struggle with imprecise or continuously varying evidence.
  • Scientific evidence often exists on a continuum of credibility, posing challenges for binary decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and advocate for the threshold model as a solution to the Sorites paradox.
  • To bridge the gap between continuous scientific evidence and categorical decision-making.
  • To provide a novel framework for understanding evidence-based decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines the theoretical underpinnings of the threshold model.
  • It analyzes the relationship between evidence credibility and decision thresholds.
  • Conceptual framework development based on philosophical logic and decision theory.

Main Results:

  • The threshold model offers a coherent method for resolving the Sorites paradox.
  • Demonstrates how a continuum of evidence can logically lead to categorical decisions.
  • Provides a formal approach to managing uncertainty in decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • The threshold model effectively addresses the Sorites paradox by integrating continuous evidence with discrete decisions.
  • This approach enhances the understanding of evidence-based reasoning in scientific and practical contexts.
  • The model offers a valuable tool for fields requiring clear decision-making from uncertain evidence.