Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
Published on: October 17, 2017
Analysis of intracranial pressure pulse waveform in studies on cerebrospinal compliance: a narrative review
Agnieszka Kazimierska1, Romain Manet2, Alexandra Vallet3,4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
Abstract:
Continuous monitoring of mean intracranial pressure (ICP) has been an essential part of neurocritical care for more than half a century. Cerebrospinal pressure-volume compensation, i.e. the ability of the cerebrospinal system to buffer changes in volume without substantial increases in ICP, is considered an important factor in preventing adverse effects on the patient's condition that are associated with ICP elevation. However, existing assessment methods are poorly suited to the management of brain injured patients as they require external manipulation of intracranial volume. In the 1980s, studies suggested that spontaneous short-term variations in the ICP signal over a single cardiac cycle, called the ICP pulse waveform, may provide information on cerebrospinal compensatory reserve. In this review we discuss the approaches that have been proposed so far to derive this information, from pulse amplitude estimation and spectral techniques to most recent advances in morphological analysis based on artificial intelligence solutions. Each method is presented with focus on its clinical significance and the potential for application in standard clinical practice. Finally, we highlight the missing links that need to be addressed in future studies in order for ICP pulse waveform analysis to achieve widespread use in the neurocritical care setting.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.

