Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2025

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Antimicrobial resistance and its detection in Staphylococcus saprophyticus urinary isolates
Kyra Y L Chua1, May Yang2, Lillian Wong2
1Department of Microbiology, Dorevitch Pathology, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Vic, Australia.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to describe the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates collected prospectively from urine specimens over a 2-month period from September to October 2022 at a single centre in Melbourne, Australia. Species identification was performed by MALDI-TOF MS. All isolates underwent phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing by disc diffusion using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines and VITEK2, and mecA polymerase chain reaction. A total of 302 S. saprophyticus isolates from 298 patients were included in this study. Most specimens (91.1%) were referred by community general practitioners from non-hospitalised patients. Antimicrobial resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics was uncommon; trimethoprim susceptibility was 97%; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 98%; nitrofurantoin, 100%; and ciprofloxacin, 100% (100% ciprofloxacin susceptible, increased exposure by EUCAST breakpoints). Methicillin resistance (by mecA detection) was the most common form of urinary antibiotic resistance at 5.6%. VITEK2 susceptibility testing for methicillin resistance had a poor specificity of 61.8% (95% CI 55.8-67.4%) compared to mecA detection. These findings indicate that empiric antibiotic recommendations of trimethoprim, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nitrofurantoin for treatment of urinary S. saprophyticus remain appropriate.

