Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Disparities in Outcomes Between Sexes in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Treated with TEVAR
Halim Yammine1, Charles S Briggs1, John R Frederick1
1Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Insights
Women with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) present with more comorbidities and larger aortic diameters. Despite anatomical differences, outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are comparable between sexes.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a treatment for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).
- Differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes undergoing TEVAR for TBAD are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate sex-based differences in the clinical presentation, anatomical characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 186 patients (112 men, 74 women) who underwent TEVAR for TBAD between 2012 and 2017.
- Comparison of presenting demographics, comorbidities, anatomical measurements (aortic diameters, true/false lumen sizes), and postoperative outcomes (survival, reintervention rates).
Main Results:
- Women were older, had lower BMI, and presented with more comorbidities (COPD, hyperlipidemia, smoking) and pain/hypertension.
- Women exhibited larger ascending aortic diameters and proportionally larger true lumens but smaller false lumens compared to men.
- Survival rates at 3 years were comparable (70% women vs. 69% men, P=0.042), while freedom from reintervention was lower in women (48% vs. 58%, P=0.13).
Conclusions:
- Women with TBAD present with distinct demographic and comorbidity profiles and unique aortic anatomical characteristics.
- Despite these differences, TEVAR demonstrates comparable survival rates between sexes, suggesting similar efficacy in managing TBAD.
- This study highlights TBAD as an aortic pathology with sex-comparable outcomes following endovascular repair.
Background:
To evaluate differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD).
Methods:
Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2017 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for TBAD at a single institution. Men (n = 112) and women (n = 74) were compared based on presenting demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention.
Results:
Women were older (P = 0.04) and had a lower body mass index (P = 0.03). More women (F) presented with continued pain or refractory hypertension (51.0% F, 30.0% M), while more men (M) presented with acute complicated dissections (19.0% F, 39.0% M) (P = 0.008). At presentation, women had statistically higher relative rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.03), and smoking (P = 0.03). Significantly more women were on Medicare without Medicaid (55.0% F, 34.0% M), while men had private insurance (35.0% F, 13.0% M) (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in blood pressure control at presentation, discharge, or at 30 days. When normalized by body surface area, women had larger ascending aortic diameters (19.2(3.10)F, 17.5(2.40)M, P = 0.0002), as well as proportionally larger true lumens at the left subclavian artery (14.9(2.90)F, 13.4(2.50)M, P = 0.0002), carina (12.6(5.80)F, 9.90(4.80)M, P = 0.0009), and celiac (10.5(4.50)F, 8.50(4.10)M, P = 0.006) levels, and at the largest point of dissection (11.6(6.50)F, 9.60(4.80)M, P = 0.04), as well as proportionately smaller false lumens at the carina (5.90(5.60)F, 9.30(6.10)M, P = 0.003). Despite not being statistically significant, women had lower rates of stroke (6.80% F, 8.00% M, P = 0.7) and acute kidney injury (5.40% F, 11.6% M, P = 0.2), as well fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.20(4.30)F, 4.60(6.60)M, P = 0.2) and an overall shorter length of stay (6.80(6.70)F, 8.00(8.20)M, P = 0.5). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for women versus men were 96.0% vs. 92.0%, 90.0% vs. 79.0%, and 70.0% vs. 69.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from reintervention for women versus men were 89.0% vs. 90.0%, 58.0% vs. 72.0%, and 48.0% vs. 58.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.13).
Conclusions:
Women present with TBAD at an older age, have more comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and have larger ascending aortic diameters for their size. Despite having less severe dissections as evidenced by smaller false lumens and wider true lumens, it does not appear that this correlates with improved outcomes for women when compared to men. It appears that this is one of the few, if not only, aortic pathologies that result in comparable outcomes between sexes.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
