Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.1K
Confidence ratings increase response thresholds in decision making.
Baike Li1,2, Xiao Hu3, David R Shanks4
1School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|October 6, 2023
Summary
Soliciting confidence ratings (CRs) during decision-making improves accuracy and response times (RTs) by increasing response thresholds. This suggests individuals become more cautious when asked to report their confidence.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Many cognitive processes are reactive, changing due to introspection and monitoring.
- Trial-by-trial confidence ratings (CRs) are known to improve decision accuracy and lengthen response times (RTs).
- The underlying cognitive mechanisms of CR reactivity in decision-making remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cognitive mechanisms behind how confidence ratings (CRs) reactively influence decision-making.
- To explore the impact of CRs on decision accuracy, response times (RTs), and underlying decision processes.
Main Methods:
- Conducted two experiments to examine the effects of confidence ratings.
- Utilized the drift-diffusion model (DDM) to analyze decision-making dynamics.
- Measured decision accuracy, response times (RTs), and response thresholds.
Main Results:
- Confidence ratings (CRs) led to enhanced decision accuracy.
- Soliciting CRs resulted in significantly longer response times (RTs).
- The drift-diffusion model analysis revealed higher response thresholds when CRs were provided.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the increased conservatism hypothesis.
- Soliciting confidence ratings appears to induce feelings of uncertainty, leading to more cautious decision-making.
- Confidence reporting reactively alters decision parameters, promoting greater accuracy through increased caution.
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
The Availability Heuristic
6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Decision Making
121
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
121
Confidence Coefficient
7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K

