The Developing Child

As children age, there are set milestones that we follow clinically to help track fine motor, gross motor, social, and language development. Because we know what a 2-month-old vs 4-month-old vs 1-year-old child should be able to do, we are able to assess whether a given child is on track developmentally. In pediatrics, three developmental stages are assessed and, if, behind there is a clear next step, often to involve early intervention. In child psychiatry, work has been done to establish stages of development as well, seen through the work of Piaget, Erickson, and others. These stages help to define the thoughts and behaviors expected for different-aged children, and thus can help with putting together our diagnostic formulation. The difficulty is that these stages are much broader temporally then the early motor, social, and language developmental milestones. Students may also be participating in the same experiences, such as the same grade level, even though they are at different developmental levels based on their age when they started school, as there could be as much as a year difference between those in a given grade. This has led to concerns about being able to distinguish a child struggling with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relative to a child who is younger than his peers, as teachers may compare a young child to their older peers when filling out assessment forms.¹ These are the developmental questions that we often must ponder as child psychiatrists, inasmuch as mental health and behavioral development are complex and influenced by many factors. In this month's Book Forum, Rishab Chawla looks more into these questions in the review of Nasty, Brutish and Short by Scott Hershovitz, pointing out that there is an overlap between the skills of a child psychiatrist to assess the behavioral impact of these developmental questions and the philosophical questions that younger children start to ponder. The child's developmental understanding of right and wrong will better help us to assess the behaviors that present to us in the office. As Rishab points out in the review, we must ask more about these children whom we see regarding these philosophical questions to better understand some of the behaviors present. Looking more deeply into a student's understanding of these questions may better help us to distinguish developmentally appropriate or inappropriate behaviors.